Causes of the boston tea party Video
What Was the Tea Act of 1773? - History causes of the boston tea partyThe more hi torical event move away from the pre ent, the more magnificently they are covered with a romantic veil. Ina relatively mall group of propagandized ailor in Petrograd arre ted the le.
What do we know about the Boston Tea Party?
The more historical events move away from the present, the more magnificently they are covered with a romantic veil. Ina relatively small group of propagandized sailors in Petrograd arrested the legitimate provisional government, and a couple of decades later a legend about heavy battles with the cadets and the "Death Battalion" was made from this episode by means of cinema, and the talented director simply hung the forged gates with mass workers. The events of the Civil War were already romanticized beyond all limits. Our fellow citizens understand the technology of manipulating consciousness with the help of art, the media and history textbooks, but pagty do Americans feel about this?
Primary links
The facts speak of their naivety. Thus, the famous "Boston Tea Party" of is considered by most of them to be the beginning of the struggle for independence. The very name of this event evokes in a person who does not know the history of the United States very well, an association with a certain collection of founding fathers, familiar from portraits on dollar bills, sitting at a set table with cups in their hands. The fact that the "Boston Tea Party" took place in the city of Boston, in a territory called Massachusetts, which later became a state, and then part of a British colony, is clear from the name. And tea is also related to this historical fact.
But he was not drunk, he was drowned. But first things first.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
The name of the event has a pronounced ironic character. To understand why a large amount of expensive goods was destroyed, one should know the international situation prior to this. What year did the Boston Tea Party take place? How were things in Britain's overseas possessions? Who did the disgrace and why? In the second half of the 18th century, almost the entire territory of the modern United States was a British colony.
The common language, religious rituals and the predominant ethnic composition of the settlers imparted a certain harmony to such administrative subordination.
Navigation menu
The habit of drinking tea, although not a staple, was also an exclusively English habit. Nobody even thought about fighting for independence from the mother country. The Seven Years' War waged by Britain has devastated the royal treasury. To improve matters, the parliament decided to increase the tax burden on overseas possessions.
It all began eight years before the Boston Tea Party happened. The control of fiscal revenues was difficult due to the large geographical distance of the American continent; it took about three months to overcome the Atlantic at that time. The difficult economic situation causes of the boston tea party aggravated by a critical situation bordering on the complete bankruptcy of the main state-owned enterprise of the empire engaged in foreign trade - the East India Company.
To save her from ruin was a matter of national importance, and for this the British government provided her with preferences, mainly concerning fees and taxes, or rather, exemption from them. Tea in the British colonies of North America came through various channels - both official and contraband.
Over the years, a certain market causes of the boston tea party has developed, varieties of experience which the consumer could choose between the goods of the legal supplier as a rule, more expensive and the cheaper, but imported, bypassing customs. As a result of the possible trade intervention of the East India Company, the whole situation changed radically. The locals didn't like it. From the point of view of the average customer, nothing bad happened. If a Boston resident has no direct relationship to the colonial trade, then what does it really matter to him in which store to buy tea? But this is only at first glance.
By destroying competing suppliers, the East India Company received an unrestricted monopoly of trade, and at the same time the ability to force all consumers to buy goods at the price it deemed correct.]
And on what we shall stop?
Now all is clear, thanks for an explanation.
You are mistaken. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.