Strengths and weaknesses of the psychodynamic approach - more than
Some psychodynamic concepts have held up well to empirical scrutiny while others have not, and aspects of the theory remain controversial, but the psychodynamic perspective continues to influence many different areas of contemporary psychology. Psychodynamic theory refers to the behavior motivated by internal or psychological forces and abnormality is caused by imbalance in internal forces that motivate the behavior. He believed that mental illnesses arises from unsolved conscious conflicts and these happens mostly in early childhood Freud Freud introduced his topographic model of the mind, which contended that the mind could be divided into three regions: conscious, preconscious, and unconscious. The preconscious contains material that is capable of becoming conscious but is not conscious at the moment because your attention is not being directed toward it. You can move material from the preconscious into consciousness simply by focusing your attention on it. Consider, for example, what you had for dinner last night. Not to worry, in a few moments it will be preconscious again, and you can move on to more important things. strengths and weaknesses of the psychodynamic approachStrengths and weaknesses of the psychodynamic approach Video
Approaches in Psychology:PsychodynamicFirst read link Chapter 9 pages of the Dugan text Adaptive leadership. Click review the week six lesson in the lesson section of the classroom. Read the Neuroscience article. After reading the text regarding Adaptive Leadership, describe this leadership style in your own words and give your interpretation of the Table 9. After reviewing apprkach case study issues, discuss the questions at the end of the case study.
Psychodynamic Approach
Instructions: Your initial post should be at least words, not including repeated questions, references and quotes. Please respond to at least two other students.
Responses should be a minimum of words. Use your own words.
WHAT EYES CAN'T SEE, LIES WITHIN THE MIND
Direct quotes should be rare in these short forum posts. Initial Post Due: Thursday, p. Avolio and Walumbwa go a step further by urging caution regarding the rapidity with which authentic leadership has been adopted, suggesting that the integration of what are still nascent and unvalidated ideas into training and development programs is risky. More than almost any other theory, scholars of authentic leadership seem to blur the boundaries of statements based on evidence versus mere conjecture.
In sum, authentic leadership presents a novel approach that attempts to extend the work of transformational leadership theories, but its novelty also serves as one of its greatest weaknesses. Table psyychodynamic. Extends the understanding of prosocial leadership theories by identifying authentic leadership as a root construct. Incorporates the concept of psychological capital as a foundation with attention toward hope, optimism, and resilience.
Lack of conceptual clarity contributing to multiple interpretations of the theory, its core concepts, and measurement. Remains largely conceptual with limited empirical testing, some of which is identified as problematic. How might authentic leadership reflect dominant norms associated with social location?
To what extent might exhibiting authenticity be dangerous based on power dynamics? What stands out as useful about authentic leadership? What do you think needs to be addressed in the deconstruction and reconstruction processes?]
In my opinion you are not right.