Titanic starting point - for
Ron Rodgers is an associate professor of journalism at the University of Florida. Teri Finneman: Welcome to Journalism History, a podcast that rips out the pages of your history books to reexamine the stories you thought you knew, and the ones you were never told. Teri Finneman: And together we are professional media historians guiding you through our own drafts of history. This episode is sponsored by ship historian Tim Yoder. Transcripts of the show are available at journalism-history. The Titanic. Our episode today explores what happened before and after the sailing and sinking of the ship, and how Titanic became a pivotal moment in public relations in journalism history. titanic starting point
Answer Question
Jim Currie said: You are spot-on, Julian. This thread is asking a specific question. In developing an answer, I requested a strait-forward answer to a simple question, which if answered in simple terms, would have, in turn, provided an answer to the said specific question regarding relative visibility. I did not sharting it.
Navigation menu
As a lawyer, you of all people will understand that a convoluted "round-the-houses" answer is usually indicative of an inability, or unwillingness to provide an answer. If it is unwillingness,then the witness being questioned has a reason for answering in such a way and that reason is for self-protection or the protection of others.
The obvious reason why the "the British Inquiry in any event attached little weight to the Carpathia firing off distress rockets in any event. Titanic starting point the same tiranic all others since then who have bent, twisted, inovated and invented to maintain the status quo would require to swallow their pride and admit error, and we can't have that now, can we?
Do you, as a lawyer, accept the concept of witness fatigue as an excuse for attempting to pervert the course of justice?
Post navigation
If so, what a gift to an on-the-ball crooked defendent. Or do you accept the practice of creating confusion in the mind of a simple, scaredhonest young man?
Keep safe. Click to expand Hi Jim, Apologies for quoting your whole reply for me, but my answer is very brief and I consider answers what I interpret as a part of the substance of your reply If Gibson "trips up" on a timing in the later stage of his British Inquiry testimony, that is not evidence of perjury.
We can now assess this titanic starting point an error and inconsequential as we have the earliest contemporaneous 18th April statements of Stone and Gibson that were not disclosed to either Inquiries. I think that deals with the point I was making.]
You commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
Excuse for that I interfere … To me this situation is familiar. Write here or in PM.
I join told all above.
You are not right. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
You are not right. Write to me in PM, we will talk.