President Obama's counter-terrorism strategy, which he unveiled last week in a high-profile speech at the National Defense University, is less off-base than incomplete, reflecting his effort to limit the scope of the problem and the requirements of the response in ways that will prove inadequate to the challenge.
The Theory Of Foreign Policy Changes
In nearly 7, words, Obama expressed ambivalence about whether America was "at war," and he gave short shrift to the contribution of state sponsorship foreign policies obama the ideology of radical Islam that are so central to terrorism. Obama's proposals make sense in and of themselves. But his approach creates hazards that are worth a closer look. First, though the foreign policies obama outlined a counter-terrorism strategy, his address will likely prove to be a morale boost to the very terrorists both those he named and others that his strategy is supposed to thwart. The president trumpeted America's withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan, boasted that "the core of al-Qaida in Afghanistan and Pakistan is on the path to defeat," and advised that beyond Afghanistan we should now turn away from a "boundless 'global war on terror'" and sonnet 33 shakespeare "persistent, targeted efforts to dismantle specific networks of violent extremists that threaten America.
That leads to the next problem.
The president said almost nothing about, and offered nothing to address, the state sponsors who fund, equip, and protect terrorists across the Middle East, Africa, Asia and Ibama America. Obama mentioned "state-sponsored networks like Hezbollah" just once; he never mentioned Iran, the world's most aggressive state sponsor of terrorism; he never mentioned Syria in this context; and he never mentioned state facilitators like Pakistan or Venezuela foreign policies obama harbor terrorists within their borders.
Essay on Foreign Policy Recommendations for the Obama Administration
Yet America will never markedly reduce the terrorist threat without confronting state sponsors foreign policies obama terrorism. And it could assuredly reduce that threat by finding ways, for instance, to squeeze those actors financially and better disrupt their provision of arms goreign terrorists. Indeed, Iran's sponsorship of Hezbollah, Hamas and other terrorist groups, and Hezbollah's presence far beyond the Middle East, is foreign policies obama key reason why Iran's pursuit of nuclear weaponry is so frightening - for Tehran could provide a nuclear weapon to one of its terrorist clients.
Syria's sponsorship is among the reasons why Syrian President Bashar Assad's demise could prove so beneficial to Western interests. Finally, the President said virtually nothing about radical Islam, the ideology that overwhelmingly drives terrorism - other than to reassure his Muslim audiences that the United States is not "at war with Islam.
Obama mentioned "extremists" or "extremism" 16 times, purposely avoiding the uncomfortable reality of a religion-based doctrine. In discussing the problem of radicalized https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-technology-in/nutrigrow.php, he avoided the issue further by listing, as examples, not just the Fort Hood shooter and Boston Marathon bombers who were clearly driven by radical Islamist ideology but also the Oklahoma City bombers and foreign policies obama year's shooter at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin who were clearly white supremacists.
What we need is foreign policies obama honest discussion of the ideological problem at hand - one that draws a clear distinction between the values of freedom, democracy, tolerance and pluralism that we cherish and the frightening intolerance and sickening violence that radical Islam propagates. What we need, more broadly, is not a narrow counter-terrorism strategy that's based on a limited outlook. Instead, we need a comprehensive strategy that addresses the challenge in its entirety, including the elements of state sponsorship and radical Islamist ideology that drive so much of the problem.
Lawrence J. Haas U. View Publication.]
I recommend to you to visit a site, with an information large quantity on a theme interesting you.
In my opinion it is very interesting theme. Give with you we will communicate in PM.
What necessary phrase... super, magnificent idea
You are absolutely right. In it something is also I think, what is it good thought.
I would like to talk to you, to me is what to tell on this question.