Traditional style would the slower paced stuff we mainly saw in Last Airbender from fights like Pakku vs Katara and Zuko vs Azula. Modern would be the faster paced stuff mainly used in Korra, like pro bending, Red Lotus and Kuvira.
More about Progressivism Vs Traditionalism
Innovative would be more specific examples like Zuko's use of firebending like a waterbender and Korra's use of metalbending like its liquid. I would say this all depends on context of the fight tbh.
You can't say one style is better than the other without having all the details of the fight. The speed difference between modern and traditional bending is almost non existent if one can bend well traditionally, modernism vs traditionalism latter is also cooler imo.
Innovative affecting behavior definitely my favorite, and I also think it's the most effective. I feel like every fighter, even within elements, is very different, so if they can come up with a style which works modernism vs traditionalism them alongside their training, then they'll become better fighters.
Prime examples of this are Korra, Kuvira, and even more traditional leaning benders like Toph, Azula, Katara, and Zuko, who all fight incorporating many new techniques that stray from the "traditional" bending. The animation is higher level.
NOVELIST, YOUTUBER, BLOGGER & NORSEMAN
The choreography, as modernism vs traditionalism the actual movements and link styles of the characters, are not necessarily better. That is an enormous generalization only Byondeon could come up with. I enjoy traditional, though I don't see how it's slower. There are plenty of fast paced battles with this style. If Ming-Hua counts as innovative, I love that style too.
The effectiveness mainly depends on the bender. There's many different levels to the term "modern" as far as bending goes, in Korra's era. On morernism end of the spectrum you have pro-benders, who are almost solely relying on MMA styles.
Traditionalism And Modernism
Then there's Zaheer, who's studied the traditional teachings of the Air Nomads, but modernism vs traditionalism had enough experience in practice, so he is making up for it with his own -- also MMA to a degree -- skills, and on the other end there's characters like Kuvira and Eska and Desna, who have been taught traditional bending by Suyin and Unalaq respectively, but have evolved those styles into what looks like faster paced, more combat-driven modern fighting, without necessarily moving away from the tradition as the core element.
Regarding innovative, it really depends on what you classify as that.
I don't think I really agree with your definition, because every great bender has little bits unique to their personal style, as a result modsrnism their character interactions, experiences, influences and beliefs. So if we go by those things you mentioned, every bender is "innovative". I personally restrict that category to particularly unique -- at least for their time -- benders. So regarding the Red Lotus, I'd say Zaheer is a modern bender, while Ming Hua is also a modern bender, but with an innovative style that https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/african-slaves-during-the-nineteenth-century/honesty-is-the-best-policy-essay.php around traditional waterbending used to complement her disability I use "complement" here even though it's a tradditionalism, because her and Toph literally made their weaknesses their main strengths.
Ghazan and P'Li are actually as traditional as a lavabender and combustion bender can be I'd say; Ghazan utilizes the hung gar and moves onto the bajiquan to lavabend, while P'Li's movements from the little "base" firebending we saw from her all correspond to the northern shaolin. With all that taken into account, I'd say both traditional and innovative are ideal styles.
Innovative styles themselves are strongly modernism vs traditionalism on traditional modernism vs traditionalism in the first place. My reasoning for not picking modern styles is that even the most traditional benders are still very unique in their approach, while also having the most impressive accomplishments under their belts.]
I consider, what is it very interesting theme. I suggest you it to discuss here or in PM.
I consider, that you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.