Platos ideal society Video
Plato on Utopia and the Ideal Society platos ideal society.In my last blogI raised the following question as my sixth pandemic puzzle :. Given that meritocracy as traditionally defined is practically impossible, is there any point at all to appealing to meritocracy as a social ideal?
Let me rehash how I got to the premise of that question. I then pointed out that in this modified system socirty competitive running, small early victories due to random variation would snowball over time to the point where two people who were equal in ability and hard work would end up starting so far apart that one would always win.
Search form
The systematic structural platos ideal society that would give rise to this outcome were linking the starting point of the next phase of competition is linked to the outcome of the previous and small differences in early advantage there will always be random variation in early performances. If the 2 n rule were in effect, competitive running would no longer be meritocratic in the defined sense. I even showed that one person could even be a bit better in terms of performance in the long run but, due to a slightly worse first race platos ideal society the 2 n rule, ends up further and further behind. The point of the analogy is not hard to see: any modern economy that rewards performance with better future opportunities will inevitably fail to be meritocratic, because any such economy will also display linking and small differences in early advantage. But my point is that even if we do think of it that way, meritocracy so defined will be forever out of reach.
Post navigation
Nevertheless—and here is my answer to the question—there are two ideas we can peel off of the mirage ideal of meritocracy that might be feasible and worth striving for, with the first being uncontroversial and the second being a bitter pill. This ideal would just limit the pernicious factors that might influence the flow of rewards and opportunities within a society: family connections, wealth, bribery, favoritism, prejudices about skin color or sexual orientation, and so on. That is, though we might find it impossible to systematically link reward with what people deserve, we can at the very least screen off clearly immoral distortions platos ideal society here way rewards are distributed.
Note, for example, that in my hypothetical here of competitive running with the 2 n rule, it is still not the case that people get ahead due to nepotism, prejudice, bribery, etc.
And since it was part of the original ideal of meritocracy that rewards should follow desert rather than family connections, etc. The second idea is just justice tempered linking.
Linking—or the idea that future reward and opportunity are linked to past performance—is an inevitable socciety of any economic system that would incentivize hard work. The problem is that there is no way to achieve linking and thereby incentive without also providing more opportunity to those who have gotten ahead due to irrelevant factors, platos ideal society random variation at early stages.
About My Essay Writer
And, of course, it appears better for everyone if hard work is incentivized. Still, that leaves a lot open. Note that in our analogy, linking was achieved via the 2 n rule.]
One thought on “Platos ideal society”