Under the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase, Video
The Louisiana Purchase ExplainedUnder the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase, - mine the
In the 16th century, the lands were used primarily to draw from the wealth of natural resources such as furs through trade with the various indigenous peoples. In the seventeenth century, successful settlements began in Acadia and in Quebec. By , the population of the new Province of Quebec reached approximately 70, settlers. In New France's population consisted of 10, Acadians , 55, Canadiens , while the territories of upper and lower Louisiana had about 4, permanent French settlers, summing to 69, people. The British expelled the Acadians in the Great Upheaval from to , which has been remembered on July 28 each year since Some also went to France. under the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase,Navigation menu
View Citing Opinions. CourtListener is a project of Free Law Projecta federally-recognized c 3 non-profit. We rely on donations for our financial security.
Donate Now. Sign In Register. Filed: February 8th, Precedential Status: Precedential. Citations: S. Docket Number: No. Judges: MR. This suit is an original proceeding in mandamus, instituted in this Court by Gus S. Wortham, relator, in his capacity as executor and trustee, in and under the will continue reading his father, the late John L. Anderson, Charles Williams, and E. Gray, who, as private citizens, set up claims to the land in controversy through grants from under the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase, United States Government.
The relator seeks to require the Land Commissioner, through writ of mandamus issuing from this Court, to classify, appraise, and value, as dry grazing lands, certain areas, a part of the public domain, within the Counties of Lipscomb, Wheeler, Collingsworth, Hemphill and Childress, lying west of the th meridian, and that such classification and appraisement be made as of the day on which the several surveys were made, that is to say, as of the months of January and April, ; further, that the Land Commissioner adopt and accept the classification and valuation of the surveys in question, as made by the County surveyors and District Land surveyors in order that relator, in behalf of the representatives and heirs of the late John L.
Wortham, may make application for the hnder of the lands, and thereafter obtain and receive patents therefor. The Land Commissioner, main respondent, answering through the Attorney General, has admitted of record, with certain reservations hereinafter mentioned, the salient facts, set forth in the petition of the Relator, and has agreed that the questions for decision by this Court are those purely of law.
In other words, the Land Commissioner, among other things, admits that the Eastern boundary line between the State of Texas and what is now the State of Oklahoma, is one that extends north from the under the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase, of the purcase, meridian with the south bank of the south fork of the Red River, to the intersection of fhe Meridian, with Parallel 36 degrees 30 minutes. Further that during such time, the State of Texas had exercised such powers, and all the usual and ordinary attributes of sovereignty only so far eastward as the line ghe known and designated as the Jones-Brown-Clark Line, except as to the area east of such line which had been embraced within the boundaries of Greer County when Texas was exercising control over the region.
Negotiations between France and the United States
Further, that after the running and location upon the ground of the Jones-Brown-Clark Line, sovereignty over such area, under claim of right to do so, was sought to be exercised by the Under the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase, of the United States, and of the State of Oklahoma, except as to that part within the th meridian embraced within the go here of Greer County, but that after the decision of the United States Supreme Court, in what is known as the Greer County Case, had been rendered, complete sovereignty was exercised over such County by the United States Government and by the under the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase, of Oklahoma, and subsequently by the State of Oklahoma, when in it was admitted into the Union as a State.
It was further stipulated in this agreement, that the State of Texas, at no period of time, continue reading the running of the Jones-Brown-Clark Line, in andhad either before or after the decision in the Greer County Case, recognized or acquiesced in such line as the established boundary on the ground between Texas and Oklahoma, and that this was equally true of the attitude of the United States Government, and of the Government of the State of Oklahoma.
Further, that since the passage by the Texas Legislature of the Act ofin which the survey of Kidder was officially recognized, the State of Texas, through its constituted authorities, continued to maintain and contend that the line run by Kidder inwhich marked the intersection of the th meridian with parallel 36 degrees 30 minutes, correctly located the true intersection of the th meridian https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/negative-impacts-of-socialization-the-positive-effects/bad-moms-summary.php the Red River, and properly marked the true boundary line on the east between the State of Texas and the State of Oklahoma.
The respondent, Walker, while admitting in substance, the facts around which the claim of the relator revolves, nevertheless, contends that the under the treaty terms for the louisiana purchase, of relator in the lands, measured by the terms of his petition, should not, in any event, extend to the true meridian, but should stop at the Kidder Line, since the Kidder Line fell short approximately The claim of each of the co-respondents Anderson, Williams, and Gray, is based upon patents issued by the Government of the United States of America, confirmed by the State of Oklahoma, prior to the adjudication of the boundary line by the Supreme Court of the United States in the decision hereinabove set out.
These patents were issued by the Government of the United States before it had been authoritatively determined that the location of the Jones-Brown-Clark Line lay considerably west of the true meridian and at a time when confusion existed in the minds of the authorities concerning the line of the th meridian astronomically marked and established on the ground.
It appears from the undisputed facts in the records, that on April 10th,John L. Wortham, applied to the District Surveyor of the Wheeler Land District for the survey of all the area lying west of the true th meridian of longitude. Because of the controversy, then undetermined, respecting the exact boundary line between Texas and Oklahoma — that is the true line of demarcation on the ground of the th meridian — the land was described in the application as that body lying east of the Counties of Collingsworth, Childress, and that part of Wheeler County, lying south of the north fork of the Red River.
Proceeding further, on May 10th,the same applicant, John L. Wortham, having doubts whether certain lands described as in the Wheeler District were therein situated this subdivision having been created out of the old Clay District filed his application for survey of all the territory lying west of the eastern boundary of the State, and east of the boundaries of Childress, Collingsworth, Wheeler, Hemphill and Lipscomb Counties, according to the line of the th meridian, located by Brown-Jones and Clark, whose delineation on the ground is discussed in a subsequent paragraph of this opinion.
The applications were made pursuant to Chapter and stains kirkcaldie, pageAct of the 29th Legislature, April 15th,at its regular session, as amended by the Act ofproviding for the sale and lease of Public School and Asylum lands, brought forward as Article in the Revised Civil Statutes of The applications, if valid, fell particularly within the pale of Section 8 of the Amended Act relating to the unsurveyed lands of the public domain. It is conceded that Wortham, the applicant, duly paid the requisite filing and surveyors fees in connection with his applications of purchase, and also other expense in making the actual surveys, and that his expenditures in the premises amounted to several thousand dollars, or at any rate, under the sworn averments of the petition, to a very considerable sum of money.
The Louisiana Territory under Spanish and French rule
The present case is one with an epic past, and is framed in a distinct, historical setting. The notable facts that led by successive stages to the immediate controversy, are intimately bound up in the life of five countries — France, America, Spain, Mexico, and Texas, and unfold a drama of the nineteenth century, in which rulers and statesman acted their part and disappeared. The shift of civilization on this part of the continent vor the Spaniard to the Anglo-American is at the bottom of the story and illustrates the course of destiny by which one race shrinks to its own confines while the other spreads to distant lands, and carries with it the precious gift of freedom tempered and restricted by law.]
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is and it is excellent idea. It is ready to support you.