Coexistence of good and evil Video
Part 1: The Coexistence of Good \u0026 Evil coexistence of good and evilThis is a place for learning and teaching Marxism. Star flair is awarded to reliable users who have good knowledge of Marxism and consistently post high quality answers. Communism: A term describing a stateless, classless, moneyless society with common ownership of the means of production. Socialism: An umbrella term used to describe social ownership of the means of production.
Social ownership can include common ownership, state ownership or collective ownership. Means of Production: Coexistence of good and evil all-embracing term that describes every non-human material factor involved in the process of socially useful production.
Bourgeoisie: The capitalist class; the ruling class in capitalist society. The social class which owns the means of production and exploits hired labor. The buyers of labor power. This class is made up of a very small minority of the population. Proletariat: The working class; the class of people in capitalist society who, deprived of any ownership of the means of production, must sell their labor power to the capitalists in order to survive. The exploited class; the producers of surplus value.
Marxists specifically use the term to refer to the expropriation theft of coexistence of good and evil labor of a worker via the extraction of surplus value by the owners of the means of production. Capitalists make their profit from exploitation. Dictatorship of the Proletariat: A state of proletarian rule where the working class organizes to democratically see more the means of production, defend against bourgeois reaction, and create the material basis for a gradual transition to communism. This term is the antithesis of the "Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie" that exists under capitalism where the minority class rules society. State: The state, in Marxist terminology, is a mechanism for class rule.
Navigation menu
It is the primary instrument of political power in class society, consisting of organs of administration, and of force. A state of one kind or another will exist as long as social classes exist. Thank you for visiting! Can someone enlighten me on the theoretical reasons for the Sino-Soviet split? Who was more correct? Thank you. These are my thoughts and they might not give you the full picture but I might give a little bit of a primer on the basic theoretical reasons for the Sino-Soviet split.
Welcome to Reddit,
Mainly, it was on the question of "revisionism" - the continuing of the dictatorship of the proletariat and the proletarian revolution under socialism. Khrushchov began to spout ideas about a "state of the whole people" and a dictatorship of "the whole people" https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/african-slaves-during-the-nineteenth-century/howard-university-essay.php of the proletarian dictatorship probably as early as the 20th or 21st Congress of the CPSU. Mao attacked this idea because so long as classes exist, it is necessary to continue the struggle against the petty-bourgeois and peasant elements of society.
Believe or not, Marx and Engels were right in saying that the peasant had reactionary tendencies due to their basic class interests land and much more with the petty-bourgeoisie small scale production. Mao said that these would bring in counterrevolutionary ideas within the Party while Khrushchov basically ignored this contradiction. Khrushchov also prated about "peaceful coexistence. Khrushchov's version of peaceful coexistence was that the proletariat should refrain from using violence because of the threat of nuclear war. Mao, imo, was absolutely correct in stating that nuclear weapons should not make us afraid because the people are coexistence of good and evil motive forces of history.
In these two debates, there is the clear contradiction of whether the proletariat should continue revolution or not and because Mao sided with the former, I absolutely believe he was the correct one in this debate. We have been developing economic and o cooperation with various countries and have joint ventures with ceoxistence countries.]
Your phrase simply excellent
Thanks, has left to read.