Ontological argument for the existence of god Video
The Ontological ArgumentOntological argument for the existence of god - have removed
Taylor's Cosmological Argument for God's Existence. There is some explanation either known or not known for everything. Existence requires explanation non-existence does not, though ceasing to exist does. The world's i. Two points Taylor makes to respond to possible objections:. Necessary beings : Couldn't have failed to exist; exist by their own nature; have their own reason for existence within themselves; have to be eternal they can't come into being or perish. Contingent beings : May or may not exist; depend on something else for their existence; perishable.
ontological argument for the existence of god
Ontological Argument The ontological argument is widely thought to have been first clearly articulated by St. Anselm of Canterbury, who defined God as the greatest conceivable being. The ontological argument was revived by Norman Malcolm in Variants of the ontological argument have been supported and defended by contemporary philosophers such as Alvin Plantinga exitsence bases his argument on modal logic and William Lane Craig.
Navigation menu
The ontological argument was first criticized citigroup swot Gaunilo of Marmoutiers, a contemporary of Anselm of Intological. He argued that the ontological argument could be used to demonstrate the existence of anything, utilizing an analogy of a perfect island. The ontological argument begins with the claim that God, by definition, is infinitely great. God, in other words, is the greatest conceivable being if one could conceive of a greater being, then that would be God. Being infinitely great entails existence in every possible world since a being that existed in merely some possible worlds would be superseded in greatness by a being that existed in every possible world.
The Five Ways Thomas Aquinas Summary
Moreover, a maximally great being is one that possesses the property of necessary existence. Thus, if a being of maximal greatness exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world. If an infinitely great being exists in every possible world then that being must exist in the actual world.
Since God is an infinitely great being, therefore, God must exist.
Ontological Argument: The Premises The conclusion of the ontological argument, as formulated by Alvin Plantinga and yhe, depends on a https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/african-slaves-during-the-nineteenth-century/antigone-online-text.php of modal axiom S5 which contends that if the truth of a proposition is possible, then it is possible in all worlds.
This axiom also contends that, if it is possible that a proposition is necessarily true that is to say, it is necessarily true in some possible worldthen it is necessarily true in all possible worlds.
Essay about Theological Virtue of Charity
This logic of the ontological argument is formally summarised by philosopher Alvin Plantinga as follows: A being has maximal excellence in a given possible world W if and only if it is omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good in W ; and A being has maximal greatness if it has maximal excellence in every possible world. It is possible that there is a being that has maximal greatness.
Premise Therefore, possibly, it is necessarily true that an omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good being exists. Therefore, by axiom S5 it is necessarily true that an omniscient, omnipotent, and perfectly good being exists. Therefore, an omniscient, omnipotent and perfectly good being exists.
Ontological Argument: Is It Sound?]
I am sorry, that has interfered... At me a similar situation. I invite to discussion.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
You are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.