The possibility of evil essay Video
The Possibility of Evil by Shirley Jackson, told by Edward E. French the possibility of evil essayEssay on the greatest social evil in our society
The British writer, actor, and comedian Stephen Fry is featured in a YouTube video which has gone viral: over 5 million views as of this moment. As you may know, Fry is, like his British counterparts Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins, a fairly ferocious atheist, who has made a name for himself in recent years as a very public debunker of all things religious. In the video in question, he articulates precisely what he would the possibility of evil essay to God if, upon arriving at the pearly gates, he discovered that he was mistaken in his atheism.
Fry says that he would ask God why he made a universe in which children get bone cancer, a universe in which human beings suffer horrifically and without justification. If such a monstrous, self-absorbed, and stupid God exists, Fry insists, he would decidedly not want to spend eternity with him. To those who feel that Stephen Fry has delivered a devastating blow to religious belief, let me say simply this: this objection is nothing new to Christians. Paul, Origen, Augustine, C. Lewis, G. Chesterton and many, many other Christian theologians up and down the centuries have dealt with it. In fact, one of the pithiest expressions of the problem was formulated by St. Thomas The possibility of evil essay in the thirteenth century. The great Catholic philosopher argued that if one of two contraries be infinite, the more info would be altogether destroyed.
Yet God is called infinitely good.
Navigation menu
Therefore, if God exists, there should be no evil. But there is evil. Thus it certainly seems to follow that God does not exist. And of course, all of this subtle theological wrestling posdibility the problem of suffering is grounded, finally, in the most devastating rant ever uttered against God, a rant found not in an essay of some the possibility of evil essay atheist philosopher but rather in the pages of the Bible. According to the familiar story, Job is an innocent man, but he is nevertheless compelled to endure every type of suffering. In one fell swoop, he loses his wealth, his livelihood, his family, and his health. A group of friends console him and then attempt to offer theological explanations for his pain.
Dog Of Pompeii Analysis
But Job dismisses them all and, with all the fury of Stephen Fry, calls out God, summoning him, as it were, into the dock to explain himself. Tell the possibility of evil essay, if you know…. Who shut within doors the sea…when I made the clouds its garment and thick darkness its swaddling bands? Go here goes on, taking Job on a lengthy tour of the mysteries, conundrums, and wonders of the universe, introducing him to ever wider contexts, situating his suffering within frameworks of meaning that he had never before considered. Secondly, I would observe that none of us can see more than a tiny swatch of that immense canvas on which God works.
And therefore I would urge him to reconsider his confident assertion that the suffering of the world—even the most horrific and seemingly unjustified—is necessarily without meaning. Imagine further that that page became, in the course of several months, further ripped and tattered so that only one paragraph of it remained legible.
Would it not be the height of arrogance and presumption for that person to declare that those words made not a lick of sense? Would it not be akin to someone, utterly ignorant of higher o, declaring that a complex algebraic formula, coherent in itself but opaque to him, is nothing but gibberish?]
And how it to paraphrase?
You are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
In it something is. Many thanks for the information. You have appeared are right.
You were visited with simply brilliant idea
Thanks for the valuable information. It very much was useful to me.