Holden Caulfield Analysis Essay
View Citing Opinions. CourtListener is a project of Free Law Projecta federally-recognized c 3 non-profit. We rely on donations for our financial security. Donate Now. Sign In Register.
Please Sign In or Register
Filed: July 1st, Precedential Status: Precedential. Citations: F. Docket Number: 09 Civ. Author: Deborah Personzlity. Plaintiff J. C from 60 Years, is an infringement on his character, Holden Caulfield, from Catcher. Plaintiff now moves for a preliminary injunction preventing Defendants from publishing, advertising, or otherwise distributing 60 Years in the United States of America during the pendency of this suit.
As set forth on the record of June pefsonality,and for the reasons stated therein, the Court found that Plaintiff possesses a valid Copyright in the novel The Catcher in the Rye, that the character of Holden Caulfield "Holden" or "Caulfield" is sufficiently delineated so that a claim for infringement holden caulfield personality lie. Additionally, for the reasons stated on the record of June 17,the Court found that the Plaintiff had access to Catcher and holden caulfield personality there are similarities that are probative of copying between the works.
Related Documents
Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc. Carol Pub. Group, Inc. Finally, the Court csulfield that Plaintiff has shown that there is substantial similarity between Catcher and 60 Years, as well as between the character Holden Caulfield from Holden caulfield personality, and the character Mr. C from 60 Years, such that it was an unauthorized infringement of Plaintiff's copyright. Suntrust Bank v.
Houghton Mifflin Company, F. The Court now addresses Holden caulfield personality claim that their novel 60 Years and its protagonist Mr. C see more fair use of Plaintiff's copyrighted work under 17 U. The Court bases its analysis on the oral arguments of June 17, and the parties' submissions. Under Rule 65, "[t]o obtain a preliminary injunction a party must demonstrate: 1 that it will be irreparably harmed if an injunction is not granted, and 2 either a a likelihood of success on the merits or b holden caulfield personality serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation, and a balance of the hardships tipping decidedly in its favor.
Board of Educ. Town of North Hempstead, F. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Reno, F. Nation Enters. The fair-use doctrine mediates between the two sets of interests, determining where each set of interests ceases to control. Koons, F. Entertainment Inc. RDR Books, F. Section calls for a four-factor test:.]
One thought on “Holden caulfield personality”