Original purpose of the constitutional convention - confirm
With the emergence of political communities came the need for them to deal with each other, to settle questions in dispute without having to go to war, to arrange the consequences of success or failure after a war had been fought, to strike alliances, organise matters of trade, settle territorial limits to their power, and so on. For such matters they needed from early times some accepted rules covering two matters, the sending of envoys and the making of agreements. Both have remained central to the conduct of what we now call international relations. Over centuries, the rules and practices governing those agreements have evolved into the modern law of treaties. The evolutionary process is a continuing one. A book on the law of treaties written at the end of the nineteenth century is recognisably about the same subject as its equivalent written today. Yet, while the general body of the law remains broadly stable, times change and bring with them changes in the law. The modern law is now authoritatively set out in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties , and in its parallel Convention of on treaties made by international organisations. They are, however, not only far from a complete code on the subject, they are also not free from continuing controversy even in respect of matters which they do deal with such as the vexed topic of reservations, which the International Law Commission is presently studying once again, having previously reported xxiii on the matter in ; moreover, as is so often the way, new issues have arisen which were not envisaged when the principal Vienna Convention of was concluded. original purpose of the constitutional convention.
Decided March 7, Opinion filed April 14, David M. Blum, William W. Cahill, Jr. Maurice Weidemeyer for Joshua F. Cockey of B. Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, Alan M. Decided per curiam on March 7, Dissenting opinion at pageinfra. The Here concluded that a completely new constitution should be prepared by delegates to original purpose of the constitutional convention convention and submitted to the voters of the State for adoption.
Pursuant to the recommendations of the Commission the Legislature by Ch. By Ch. Chapter also provided that each County and each of the legislative districts of Baltimore City should have the same number of delegates in the convention as Ch. The special election proposed by Ch. The vote wasfor a constitutional convention and 31, against.
Although the number of favorable votes was more than a majority of the total votes cast in the special election, that purposs was a minority of the total votes cast in the primary election. When the General Assembly of began consideration of legislation to provide for the qualifications of delegates to the convention, the manner of their election, their compensation and the duration of and other matters relating to the convention, almost immediately it was confronted with problems, most of which stemmed from the prohibitions of the existing constitution against the holding of more than one office of profit or trust under the constitution or laws of the State. These legal questions, which included 1 the validity of Chs. XVI of the Constitution provides that no law fish br an office shall be enacted as an emergency law, and 2 the eligibility of members of the Legislature and other public officers to serve as delegates to the convention, caused grave concern to the General Assembly and to the Secretary of State, in his case for their bearing on the origknal of his functions in relation to the elective process.
To original purpose of the constitutional convention a solution to the dilemma, the Legislature enacted Ch.]
One thought on “Original purpose of the constitutional convention”