Caesar at alesia - apologise
They culminated in the decisive Battle of Alesia in 52 BC, in which a complete Roman victory resulted in the expansion of the Roman Republic over the whole of Gaul mainly present-day France and Belgium. While militarily just as strong as the Romans, the Gallic tribes' internal divisions helped ease victory for Caesar; Vercingetorix 's attempt to unite the Gauls against Roman invasion came too late. Still, Gaul was of significant military importance to the Romans, as native tribes, both indigenous to Gaul and farther to the north, had attacked them several times. Conquering Gaul allowed Rome to secure the natural border of the Rhine river. The wars began with conflict over the migration of the Helvetii in 58 BC, which drew in neighboring tribes and the Germanic Suebi. By 57 BC, Caesar had resolved to conquer all of Gaul, and led campaigns in the east, where the Nervii nearly defeated him. In 55 BC, Caesar sought to boost his public image, and undertook first of their kind expeditions across the Rhine river and the English Channel. caesar at alesiaConquered, We Conquer
The moment Brennus threw his swords on the scales and bellowed "Vae victis! Doomed is perhaps a harsh word, yet history has proven this to be true. But how? Brennus had destroyed the Roman phalanx army at Allia a few days before, had besieged- and then captured- the city of Rome itself. Gauls ruled the lands from modern Florence north to the sea, from the Rhein in the east caesar at alesia the Atlantic in the West. Celtic warlords ruled Britannia and Spain, the mountains of Switzerland, and southeast to the Black Sea. Yet three and a half centuries later, only the island-bound Britons remained, and a century later they too fell caesar at alesia Roman might. Who were these Gauls? And how could they be so thoroughly conquered by a single city they themselves had conquered? The answer to the first question is rather difficult, while that of the second is here easy.
Why is the first so difficult? Well, the Gauls had no written language. Their histories and laws were memorized by the Druids, whose incredible feats of memory were legendary and well-documented. When the Druids died out, so did the Gallic point of view.
This leaves us with the written records of those who they fought- the Greeks and Romans- both of whom have ample reason to portray the Gauls in a manner suiting their own ends and aims. It is very true that the victors write the histories.
So caesar at alesia link to step away from the bias, and examine the remaining facts in pure form. Origins Archaeological evidence leads us to believe the Gauls evolved into tribes approximately three thousand five hundred years ago, in the northern part of Modern Germany. Five hundred years later we have evidence of them in southern Germany, suggesting their displacement south toward warmer weather- and maybe under pressure from the emerging Germanic tribes just forming along the Baltic coast.
From caesar at alesia they spread in all directions, to Gaul and Britannia in the west, Spain in the Gilgamesh essays, northern Italy in the due south, and along the Danube to the southeast. Artifacts left behind tell us that the Gauls were an Iron-Age people, and among the first to use steel. They were masters of working with iron, and from the bridle-bits and other pieces of equipment we can see that they were clever workers of metal and great horsemen indeed.
They were among the first to use iron in swords. The chainmail corselet is attributed to https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-technology-in/greatawakening-voat.php origins, and their Norican steel was reputed to be the finest anywhere. Their grave sites also tell us much.
They were on average taller than the Mediterranean peoples, and had artistic ability. They minted coins, developed art, and were ingenious craftsmen. They had a rich and developed polytheistic religion covering most aspects of tribal life and society. They were a race of tall, strong warriors, clad in shirts of steel, wielding iron weapons when others were still into bronze, and fantastic horsemen. They ruled the lands from East to West, and from South to North.
Yet within three hundred fifty years of conquering Rome, they themselves were but subjugated tribes bled white by Roman steel, leading us to the second question- how was this possible? From the date, we can infer that the Romans were still deployed in caesar at alesia old phalanx legion.
Muhammad Ali: A Tragic Hero
Any article source worth his salt knows that cavalry and phalanxes do not mix- head-on the phalanx will eat caesar at alesia the cavalry, from any other direction the phalanx is vulnerable to cavalry. And the Gauls were the premier horsemen of their day. Thus the Roman legions perished by the Allia and Rome herself was occupied for seven months, until the Gauls moved on with the coming of spring. Thereafter, in almost every battle and definitely in every war, the Romans defeated their Gallic opponents until the last continental Gallic tribe capitulated at Alesia.
A quick comparison of the Gallic and Roman militaries will reveal part of the answer. Arms and Armor Gallic warhosts were primarily infantry, much caesar at alesia the rest of Europe at the time, but they had a heavier proportion of their magnificent cavalry than the other armies.]
It is very valuable phrase
In it something is. Clearly, thanks for the help in this question.
I have not understood, what you mean?
Analogues exist?
Willingly I accept. In my opinion, it is an interesting question, I will take part in discussion. Together we can come to a right answer. I am assured.