Communism vs socialism vs capitalism vs fascism vs democracy - your
That is what the United States did to Iraq and Libya after The idea is to deny them key inputs, above all in essential technology and information processing, raw materials, and access to bank and financial connections, such as U. The second option is to occupy rivals. But the usual, more efficient occupation is by U. She had urged that America should make Libya turn over its vast oil reserves as reparations for the cost of destroying its society.Something: Communism vs socialism vs capitalism vs fascism vs democracy
| Communism vs socialism vs capitalism vs fascism vs democracy | 21 hours ago · Michael Hudson: America’s neoliberal financialization policy vs. China’s industrial socialism April 18, ; For an ecosocialist transition that breaks from capitalism: Arguments and proposals April 17, ; Supreme Court confirms annulment of all charges against Lula April 17, 4 days ago · Nearly half a millennium ago Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince described three options for how a conquering power might treat states that it defeated in war but that “have been accustomed to live under their own laws and in freedom: the first is to ruin them, the next is to reside there in person, the third Continue Reading Prof Michael Hudson on the US - China battleground of monopoly. 3 days ago · America’s Neoliberal Financialization Policy vs. China’s Industrial Socialism April 15, ; The latest US moves against Russia (OPEN THREAD #11) UPDATED!!! April 15, ; Why It Is Not Advised April 15, ; The news media offers wall-to-wall propaganda every day. We only notice when a royal dies April 14, ; Whither the Ukraine? |
| Comanche county memorial hospital medical records | Cell membrane transport lab report |
| Literary history definition | 3 days ago · America’s Neoliberal Financialization Policy vs. China’s Industrial Socialism April 15, ; The latest US moves against Russia (OPEN THREAD #11) UPDATED!!! April 15, ; Why It Is Not Advised April 15, ; The news media offers wall-to-wall propaganda every day. We only notice when a royal dies April 14, ; Whither the Ukraine? Umm, marxism is communism The only people who will be "oppressed" are the former capitalist oppressors - if they refuse to become workers. Some people believe socialism can be instilled by the democratic process. See r/DemocraticSocialism. By the way, "freedum" is not anything to uphold and value. All it does is oppress others in your pursuit. 4 days ago · Nearly half a millennium ago Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince described three options for how a conquering power might treat states that it defeated in war but that “have been accustomed to live under their own laws and in freedom: the first is to ruin them, the next is to reside there in person, the third Continue Reading Prof Michael Hudson on the US - China battleground of monopoly. |
That is what the United States did to Iraq and Libya after The idea is to deny them key inputs, above all in essential technology and see more processing, raw materials, and access to bank and financial connections, such as U. The second option is to occupy rivals. But the usual, more efficient occupation is by U. She had urged that America should make Libya turn over its vast oil reserves as reparations for the cost of destroying its society. They have a lot of oil.
Most Americans would choose not to engage in the world because of that deficit.
CounterPunch
That policy of privatization by a client oligarchy with its own source of wealth based on the U. The way in which client oligarchies were created was a grabitization that utterly disrupted the economic interconnections integrating the economies. ByBrzezinski saw Pax Americana unravelling from its failure to achieve these aims.
The problem was not Russia, whose Communist nomenklatura let their country be ruled by a Western-oriented kleptocracy, but China. The U. This contrast in whether money and credit, land and natural monopolies will be privatized and duly concentrated in the hands of a rentier oligarchy or used to promote general prosperity and growth has basically become one of finance capitalism and socialism.
Yet in its broadest terms this conflict existed already years ago in the contrast between Near Eastern kingship and the Greek and Roman oligarchies.
Navigation menu
These oligarchies, ostensibly democratic in superficial political form and sanctimonious ideology, fought against the concept of kingship. China and Russia are existential threats to the global expansion of financialized rentier wealth. The United States hoped that China might be go here gullible as the Soviet Union and adopt neoliberal policy permitting its wealth to be privatized and turned into rent-extracting privileges, to be sold off to Americans. But instead of adopting market-based neoliberalism, Mr. These pacts assume economies that are primarily market based with the role of the state circumscribed and micro-economic decisions largely left to private interests operating under a rule of law.
America’s Neoliberal Financialization Policy vs. China’s Industrial Socialism
This is jaw-dropping hypocrisy — as if the U. It is a case of the pot calling the more info black, a fantasy depicting American industry as being independent of government. While U. American industry grew strong in the 19th century by government support, just as China is now providing. That was the doctrine of industrial capitalism, after all. But as the U. China has shown itself to be aware of the risks in financialization, and has taken measures to attempt to contain it.
That has helped it achieve what used to be the U. Here is the U. Financialized industrial capital wants a strong state to serve itself, but not to serve labor, consumers, the environment or long-term social progress at the cost of eroding profits and rents. China also is providing an object lesson in how to protect its economy and that of its allies from foreign sanctions and related destabilization. Its most basic response has been to prevent an independent domestic or foreign-backed oligarchy from emerging.
That has been one first and foremost by maintaining government control of finance and credit, property and land tenure policy in government hands with a long-term plan in mind.]
And where at you logic?
I do not know, I do not know
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.
I think, what is it — a lie.
Your phrase is brilliant