Nineteen states have laws allowing betwween execution of a person that committed crimes at sixteen or seventeen. Sincetwo hundred and twenty-six juvenile death sentences were imposed on these poor teens. To this day, according to ACLU, there have been twenty-two juvenile offenders who are dead and eighty-two who are still on death row.
Juvenile Delinquent Essay
Approximately seventy-nine young adolescents have been sentenced to die in prison nationwide. This was because some states tried to enact laws making it easier to impose life without parole sentences on adults. When giving a person a sentencing in general, the court system needs to take into consideration the age, mental state, and who the person committing the crime is as a person. Deciding on whether or not to make the life sentence applicable to minors should depend on the specific situation.
Navigation menu
Some of these teens can change their lives completely if the court system gives them a second chance and gives them a minor punishment so they can learn their lesson from the whole situation. Garinger also states in the article that young people are biologically different than adults, meaning that their brains are not fully developed to be tried in court as an adult.
While adolescents can be held accountable for their actions, scientific information demonstrates that they can not fairly be held accountable to the same extent as adults. These findings confirm that adolescents generally have a greater tendency towards impulsivity, making unsound judgments or reasoning, and are less aware of the consequences of their actions.
A study done in at the Source of California Los Angeles, states quite a few hypotheses, that have been postulated for why juveniles may engage in impulsive and risky behaviors.
Accounts of juvenile trials suggest cour it is a period of development associated with progressively greater efficiency of cognitive control capacities.
Essay On Delinquent Juveniles
This efficiency in cognitive control is described as dependent on the maturation of the prefrontal cortex which has yet to mature. This basic function controls reasoning and emotions.
Improved cognitive control with the continue reading of the prefrontal cortex is consistent with an increase in this ability from childhood to adulthood. Without proper cognitive function, a person can make a mistake without thinking of the consequence. And to answer whether or not a juvenile has the same capable impulse control and decision making as an adult brain does, the answer is no. The very part of the brain that is judged by the legal system, comes on board late. Some people believe that the very essence of what dictates who is a child or an adult, are the choices the individual makes.]
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. Let's discuss.
Cold comfort!