Gonzales vs raich Video
Gonzales V. Raich Final Recording gonzales vs raich.Remarkable: Gonzales vs raich
| Labeling theory criminal justice | 5 hours ago · Opinion for County of San Diego v. San Diego NORML, Cal. App. 4th — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. 6 days ago · Gonzales v. Raich, U.S. 1, 14 () (citations omitted). The production or distribution of marijuana is a felony offense under federal law. See 21 U.S.C. § 9 8 It is spelled "Marihuana" under the statute. 9 In contrast, opioids are a Schedule II substance under the CSA and are considered an accepted medical use in treatment in the. 3 days ago · Marijuana has forced its path as a controversial topic recently due to a large consensus of citizens advocating for marijuana to be legalized for both recreational use and medical purposes. |
| BITS OF WAR | Invention essays |
| Gonzales vs raich | 177 |
CourtListener is a project of Free Law Projecta federally-recognized c 3 non-profit. We rely on donations for our financial security. Donate Now. Sign In Register.
Post navigation
Filed: April 13th, Precedential Status: Precedential. Citations: None known. Docket Number: A The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document provided by the court and may have typos. You may prefer reading the original. Your Notes edit none.
Cited By 0 This case has not yet been cited in our system. Authorities 30 This opinion cites: Squeo v. Comfort Control Corp. Rath Packing Co. Raich, U. Davidowitz, U. Please support our work with a donation.
Recent Posts
Santomauro, on the briefs. Victor B. In this case of first impression, we consider whether a workers' compensation judge can order an employer to reimburse its employee for the employee's use of medical marijuana rakch for chronic pain following a work-related accident. Therefore, it gonzales vs raich not excluded under the MMA from reimbursing the costs of medical marijuana. Here, where petitioner has demonstrated the severity and chronic nature of his pain, his attempts to gonzales vs raich alleviate the pain with multiple surgeries and medical modalities, and the validated efficacy of the prescribed medical marijuana, we find the use of medical marijuana raoch reasonable and necessary.
Finding no legislative or legal barrier to an employer's reimbursement of its employee's expense for medical marijuana in a workers' compensation setting, we affirm the order. Following the accident, petitioner immediately experienced lower back pain that radiated down both legs, describing it as a "shooting and stabbing pain[].]
One thought on “Gonzales vs raich”