Rational systems theory - was specially
I am reading a book about rational decision making [1] There is an example of transitivity rule: If you prefer fish to burgers and burgers to pudding, you should also prefer fish to pudding. However, we do not always adhere to this principle, as shown in the following example [ Consider this example: If I like rice more than peas, and peas more than zucchini, a rational decision according to transitivity rule would be that I choose rice over zucchini. So, what is going on here? Is it a nuance of human language that I failed to interpret? Or is it a case of non linearity? Is it correct to say transition rule may only apply to linear problems, that maps a set of consequences in the same set of conditions E. How to deal with emergence of complexity, where outcomes may emerge from a combination of elements and belong to a "wider" set e. rational systems theory.
Sociology American Journal of Education Because in recent years I have experienced basic distortions of far simpler arguments, I was genuinely pleased with the accuracy exhibited by Mark Holmes in laying out my position. A second reason for commending his rational systems theory is that he has put in sharper focus a fundamental issue that has become sywtems Achilles' heel of the romantic, technicist, and emancipatory streams of liberal theories of education.
It is also a key aspect of the confusion that surrounds recent attempts to use the traditional… Expand.]
Yes, really. So happens. We can communicate on this theme.
It is very a pity to me, I can help nothing to you. I think, you will find the correct decision. Do not despair.
I consider, that you are not right. I suggest it to discuss.
In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM.
You have quickly thought up such matchless phrase?