Rational vs adaptive expectations - pity, that
They are often studied in psychology and behavioral economics. Although the reality of most of these biases is confirmed by reproducible research, [2] [3] there are often controversies about how to classify these biases or how to explain them. Gerd Gigerenzer has criticized the framing of cognitive biases as errors in judgment, and favors interpreting them as arising from rational deviations from logical thought. Explanations include information-processing rules i. Biases have a variety of forms and appear as cognitive "cold" bias, such as mental noise, [5] or motivational "hot" bias, such as when beliefs are distorted by wishful thinking. Both effects can be present at the same time. There are also controversies over some of these biases as to whether they count as useless or irrational , or whether they result in useful attitudes or behavior. For example, when getting to know others, people tend to ask leading questions which seem biased towards confirming their assumptions about the person. rational vs adaptive expectations
I recently went on a two-week meditation retreat. Seven Factors of Awakening. I had a great retreat.
There is a lot that clicked into place, and in time I will share it in posts, articles, and videos. For now I just wanted to share an interesting insight I got. The overall idea here is that in order to sustain a state of consciousness where meditation has benefits one needs to have a state of mind that has a lot of control over itself. In this light, when your mind is too excited and restless you should put emphasis on the tranquilizing factors concentration, equanimity, and tranquility.
When your mind is too sluggish or sleepy, you put extra emphasis on the exciting factors investigation, energy, and joy. Rational vs adaptive expectations the balancing factor mindfulness is what allows you to keep track of this process without getting distracted by the hindrances.
Revealing the computational properties of consciousness
This allows you to cybernetically stay in the zone most conducive to meditative development. Importantly, I think that the factors themselves are best developed in that zone. So it may be futile to ask someone who is panicking to focus on tranquility IF they have not focused on tranquility before rational vs adaptive expectations they were in the optimal zone. So for a lot of people developing the seven factors is going to be a bootstrapping process. Pragmatically, I expect that e.
Navigation menu
In addition to valence and arousal, the seven factors also allow you to cybernetically stay in the zone for two additional key dimensions. Together they can help you stay in the optimal zone along these four dimensions! Then you use the seven factors in order to direct the evolution of the flow into healing and harmonious dynamics. Doing this over and over will, over time, allow you to create a very wholesome and healing flow. More specifically, here are the seven factors as seen through the lens of Neural Annealing:.
The holy grail here would rational vs adaptive expectations the creation of a high-entropy alloy that blends together all seven factors. As you start developing some of the factors, you can use them to weld the flow in such a way that developing the other factors becomes easier.
Then you can start developing two or more factors simultaneously e.]
It is remarkable, it is the amusing answer
Happens... Such casual concurrence
In it all charm!