White mans burden interpretation - matchless message
In which case I think we can reasonably ask, why are we not responsible for all the third world peoples, especially those who remain behind? If, say, we are responsible for the economic and social welfare of the immigrants and refugees who leave who are deprived as such, why are we responsible only for the peoples when they leave their borders? Then what business is it of ours? If prima facie every government in the world is responsible for every needy, desperate and suffering people in the world, regardless of their origins and nationality, then we ought also be responsible for the needy, desperate and suffering people who remain under persecution in their native land. This may or may not be a bad thing, depending on how efficacious your imperial project is. That is what the government is for, to weigh and judge the feasibility of various options based on empirical facts which most people do not have access to, to discern its consequences upon other objectives, to attempt to weigh and reconcile the various objectives together, and to make the appropriate decision. The most the rest of us masses can do is to discuss the abstract principle at play, and at the conceptual level, there has been very little coherence in the argument. Most people treat the government as a moral agent or person which is essentially a form of anthropomorphism of the government. But as Albert Camus once puts it, to paraphrase him, the state does not have a conscience, sometimes it has a policy, that is all. white mans burden interpretation.This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source. From Antiwar.
English poet Rudyard Kipling's spirit may breathe a sigh of relief now that President Joe Biden has decided to end the latest March of Folly into Afghanistan. Kipling immortalized the phrase "White Man's Burden" used as an excuse for European-American imperialism.
Post navigation
There can be many a slip between cup and lip but, for the nonce, it does seem as though the Western White U. In Afghanistan, as was the case with the war in Vietnam, US generals and courtier pundits lied through their teeth. They continually lied about the progress they were making, as Craig Whitlock makes clear in excruciating white mans burden interpretation in his Dec. You did not have to go through the crucible of Herb garden quotes -- or wait for honest reporting from the very few like Whitlock -- to discern how Americans, including some presidents, were being misled on Afghanistan.
The experience of Vietnam, though, did throw rather clear deja-vu light on this latest folly and its spurious justifications. With a modicum of experience in media analysis, it was not difficult to penetrate the deceit and piece together what was really going on. I am almost amused thinking back on how President Reagan's CIA Director, Bill Casey, was astonished to learn that over 80 percent of white mans burden interpretation analysis was based on open sources. When interpretatioon journalists ask the agency's PR unit interprettaion me, the standard answer is that, since I no longer have access to classified reporting, I cannot possibly know what is going on. But at a time when Gen. David Petraeus prevented my former analyst colleagues from having input into decisions on the relative merits of "surging" tens whote thousands more troops into Afghanistan, I did not need intelligence from sleuths, surveillance, spies, or satellites to warn President Obama 12 years ago that:.
See: Welcome to Vietnam, Mr. PresidentMarch 28, At the end of the fight Lies a tombstone white With the name of the late deceased.
Navigation menu
Next Page 1 2. Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher.
OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help. If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.]
One thought on “White mans burden interpretation”