Hokkaido University Abstract In this paper, I argue that by attributing beliefs the attributer is pushed folk psychology taking a stand on the content of those beliefs and that what stand they take partially depends on the relationship between the attributer and the attributee.
![folk psychology folk psychology](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/iBwAAOSwsTdfPRC0/s-l300.jpg)
In particular, if the attributee enjoys a higher social standing than the attributer, the latter is disposed to adopt the attributed belief, as long as certain other conditions are met. I will call this view the Adoption-by-Attribution model.
![folk psychology folk psychology](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1401759012i/22395193._UY630_SR1200,630_.jpg)
Because of the non-epistemic influence that derives from the relation of inequality, belief attribution can reinforce the existing unequal power relations and contribute to epistemic injustice.]
The absurd situation has turned out
I can not participate now in discussion - it is very occupied. But I will be released - I will necessarily write that I think on this question.
Completely I share your opinion. In it something is and it is excellent idea. It is ready to support you.
Excuse for that I interfere … I understand this question. Write here or in PM.
It agree, your idea is brilliant