homosexuality is not a choice
Reading through this platform, I found an article entitled " Can homosexuals become Christians? However, his ending points dilute the whole message he intended to pass across. He uses his last paragraphs to make unjustifiable and false conclusions about homosexual persons and the whole other sexually queer groups Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, Bisexual and Intersex. I will not go into details about his argument for or against Christianity accommodating homosexual persons, but will deal with his ending points.
Homosexuality Vs Homosexuality
The writer seems to be oblivious of the factual tenets that sorround the issue of homosexuality. He prescribes to the ignorant, yet dangerous, concept that "homosexuality is a choice.
The same stereotype has mutated to prejudice and discrimination in many countries here the world. In countries like Yemen and Mauritania, any homosexual behaviour is punishable by death. Other countries like Uganda and Nigeria recently prescribed punitive laws for any homosexual behaviour in a stance adopted by African despots to stamp their authority.
Navigation menu
However, scientifically, there is no universal consensus on why someone is born with a particular sexuality. In the next ohmosexuality, we shall see why. I agree with https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-technology-in/tnt-br.php writer that the research on the gay gene is inconclusive. However, I distate the way he undermines the research as 'shallow'.
Whereas evidence has so far shown that no one is genetically born gay, it is inconclusive, meaning that it can or will change as new evidence arises. However, the focus of scientific research into homosexuality has not just limited itself into gay genes. It explores other factors that lead to such an identity or orientation. Sexual feelings scientifically provide a good measure of sexual orientation. BBC According to Psychology Today, new evidence has forced biologists to revise their views on homosecuality based on two perspectives: evidence of gay genes and gay animals. Scientific evidence so far shows that homosexuality is a sex-linked trait, even though little is known about its genetic mechanisms. Research has shown that homosexuality is an example of a normal and natural variation in human sexuality and is not in and of itself a ont of negative psychological effects.
Most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation. They base homosexuality is not a choice origins of homosexuality on homosexuality is not a choice factors: hormones, environment womb or uterus and genes. They put emphasis on the first two due to the prevailing ease of access to evidence. Study has also shown that exposure to unusual levels of hormone before birth can also affect sexuality. For example, female fetuses exposed to higher levels of testosterone before birth show higher rates of lesbianism later on.
BBC Therefore, such evidence dispels the myth that homosexuality is a choice as the writer wants us to believe. Second, scientific evidence shows that that psychological interventions cannot aid in changing one's sexual orientation. Go here writer disparagingly puts across homosexuality as a 'craving' that, similar to sexual addiction, the person can stop.
His remedy? Seeking God's forgiveness! He thinks it is a sin. Any person who discriminates against gay people has never hmosexuality the pain associated with love or denial of the chance and choice to love. Homosexual persons seek companionship from persons of the same sex to whom they are chlice to.
They desire emotional support from their partners.]
On mine it is very interesting theme. I suggest you it to discuss here or in PM.
You have hit the mark. In it something is also I think, what is it good idea.