Military revolution - possible
More American territory changed hands in than any settlement before or after, destabilising existing alliances and trade networks, and leading to conflict between settlers and American Indians. Both sides agreed with the principle but disagreed on where to set the border; keeping the peace required garrisons of regular troops along the frontier, and led to disputes with the colonial legislatures over who should bear the expense. While external affairs were managed by London , colonial militia were funded locally but with the ending of the French threat in , the legislatures expected less taxation, not more. At the same time, the huge costs of the Seven Years' War meant Parliament expected the colonies to fund their own defense. These measures were followed by the Sugar Act and Stamp Act , which imposed additional taxes on the colonies to pay for defending the western frontier. North insisted on retaining duty on tea to enshrine Parliament's right to tax the colonies; the amount was minor, but ignored the fact it was that very principle Americans objected to. A banking crisis led to the near-collapse of the East India Company , which dominated the British economy; to support it, Parliament passed the Tea Act , giving it a trading monopoly for North America. Since most American tea was smuggled by the Dutch, the Act was opposed by those who managed the illegal trade, while being seen as yet another attempt to impose the principle of taxation by Parliament. While aimed specifically at Massachusetts, many in America and within the Whig opposition considered them a threat to liberty in general; it led to increased sympathy for the Patriot cause locally, as well as in Parliament and the London press. With the exception of Georgia , twelve colonies sent representatives to the First Continental Congress to agree on a unified response to the crisis. military revolutionThis raises questions about the way forward, who are reliable allies in military revolution struggle and how the military junta can be overthrown. International Socialist Alternative believes that the heroic masses who have cornered the junta are the force that must finish the job. All-out offensive by the masses is needed In recent months, the masses, with the working class at the centre, have shown their determination to break the power of the military leadership. This power is based not just on their control of the political structures, but using the military-controlled companies, also on an economic system which exploits and oppresses working people and the poor.
It is logical now, that in order to protect people from the violence of the army, more effective methods of resistance are being sought, including medical assistance and even arming against the terror of the junta. military revolution
This logical military revolution step needs to be followed by the coordination of self-defense groups, under the democratic control of those who make the revolution: the workers, the young and the poor. Medics, textile workers, care workers, teachers and many others by taking strike reovlution have ensured that the military leaders did not get away with their coup. They must not allow that the initiative slips out of their hands now. Defense of the movement is not a here military issue. If military revolution were the case, the army would have crushed the movement from the very beginning. Resistance is continuing because it has broad support in society: that is a political issue.
Navigation menu
Strikes have set the tone and point to the important role of the working class in paralyzing the entire system. Intuitively, unity is sought in the fight against the army leadership, including with and by the many minority populations.
Yet the power of the army is not yet broken. Repression is spreading, military revolution death toll is rising. It is impressive that the movement has lasted for more than two months. However, a general offensive based on an all-out general strike and self defense is needed to isolate the junta and to avoid giving the military leadership time to re-organize, so that it can then hit back with even more repression. Not just military, but a military revolution struggle Such an all-out offensive requires coordination and a political program that defines military revolution objectives of the movement.
Milktary will also demonstrate to ordinary soldiers and their families that the generals are reolution defending their own interests, making it easier to detach them from the current regime. A political program of social change must include the complete dismantling of the Tatmadaw the armytaking the key sectors of the economy into public hands to allow for democratic planning to address the needs of the majority of the population.
It should recognize the rights of all minorities to self-determination, including the right to secession. It should reject any interference by foreign governments, each of which defend their own economic military revolution based on the exploitation of the Myanmar people. The masses will not win this revolution by fighting heroically barricade by barricade, but military revolution defending an alternative for the organization of https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/african-slaves-during-the-nineteenth-century/powder-by-tobias-wolff-theme.php. This is how they will be able to respond to all forms of oppression.
It is also the way in which the movement will appeal more to ordinary policemen and soldiers who are tired of shooting at their brothers and sisters, but will not cross over to the movement until they see in it the basis for an alternative society. No trust in any ruling class, locally, regionally or internationally Many demonstrators hope that the UN will intervene to bring order. The anger against the Chinese regime is reinforced by the fact that it is blocking a stronger UN position. This was clear afterwhen active cooperation with the UN circles led to an opening up military revolution the West. The resulting economic development was accompanied by enormous inequality with elements of mafia capitalism in which both the army and some ethnic armies participated fully. The changes that followed were not motivated by the interests of the people, but were intended more to protect at least part of the army leadership from the threat of complete system breakdown, and mass protest that could have put an end to their rule.
They were reforms from above to avoid revolution from below.
Ten years on, military revolution see the milltary of this policy: the global capitalist economic and health crises have exacerbated existing inequalities and tensions and brought them to a boiling point. Why would the UN do things differently today? Neither the ruling establishment at home, nor that of other countries can bring real change.
Only the masses, with the working class at their centre have the potential power to bring the system to a military revolution, but also to take control of military revolution itself, eliminating the profit-seeking of big business, multinationals and mafiosi. Many protesters are placing great hope in an alternative federal army made revolutlon of the forces of the ethnic armies. With over a hundred ethnic minorities and many flash-points, Myanmar has had elements of civil war for decades.]
Excuse, that I can not participate now in discussion - there is no free time. I will be released - I will necessarily express the opinion on this question.