It received widespread praise from critics and was nominated for seven Emmy Awardswinning three, including Best Documentary. The film deconstructs the church's claims by presenting a condensed history of Scientology and its founder, L. Ron Hubbardexamining how celebrities interact with the church, and highlighting the stories of a number of ex-members and of the abuse and exploitation that they described seeing and experiencing. The Church of Scientology responded vehemently to the film, complaining to film critics about their reviews and denouncing the filmmakers and their interviewees. It was a major ratings success and by mid-April had attracted 5. It was subsequently released internationally, showing in theaters and on television despite a sustained campaign by the Church of Scientology to block its release. Going Clear is based closely on Lawrence Wright's book, covering much of the paul haggis oscars ground with the aid of https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/why-building-administrations-have-a-developing-business/foucault-discipline-and-punish-quotes.php footage, paul haggis oscars reconstructions, and interviews with eight former Scientologists: [1] [2] Paul Haggisan Oscar-winning film director; Mark Rathbunthe church's former second-in-command; Mike Rinderthe former head of the church's Office of Special Affairs ; actor Jason Beghe ; Sylvia "Spanky" Taylor, former liaison to John Travolta ; and former Scientologists Tom DeVocht, Sara Goldberg, and Hana Eltringham Whitfield.
The film breaks into three distinct acts.
entertainment
In the first, the former Scientologists describe how they joined Scientology; the second act recounts the history of Scientology paul haggis oscars its founder L. Ron Hubbard ; and in the final act, the film airs allegations of the abuse of church members and misconduct by its leadership, particularly David Miscavigewho is accused of intimidating, beating, imprisoning, and exploiting subordinates. Pau, film depicts the role played by celebrity members, such as Travolta and Tom Cruisethrough video clips contrasting their statements with the experiences of former Scientologists. To support its thesis, the film utilises footage of ex-Scientologists harassed and surveilled per Hubbard's dictum that the church's critics were all criminals whose crimes needed to be exposed[5] and describes the imprisonment of senior Scientology executives in a facility known as " The Hole "; [6] one Scientologist was said to have been forced to clean a bathroom with his tongue.
It was the first time that HBO had tackled Scientology directly, though not the first time it had clashed with paul haggis oscars church; inprotesters mounted oscrs outside HBO's headquarters because of a documentary that presented anti-depressant drugs, which are fiercely opposed by Scientology, in a positive light.
Join our new commenting forum
Gibney began working on Going Clear in after becoming intrigued by Paul haggis oscars book. He collaborated with https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/a-simple-barcoding-system-has-changed-inventory/idrivesafelycom-texas.php, who came on board as a producer, to explore the book's underlying theme of "how people become prisoners of faith in various ways". Fear of Scientology's litigiousness rendered American networks unwilling to license any material to the filmmakers, which Gibney found "astounding".
I think at the end of the day, that tells you more about Scientology than it does about the networks, which is how ruthless they've been in trying to silence any criticism. Explaining why he chose to make a film about Scientology, Gibney told Reuters that he considered it "an important topic. Not only paul haggis oscars this church of Scientology, which everybody's fascinated bats quotes about partially because of the celebrities, but partially because of the way that the church seems to turn people to do things that I think they would normally never do if had they not entered the church.
The Wall Street Journal described it as "the hottest ticket" at the festival. The initial theatrical release was deliberately small-scale, most likely undertaken to ensure that Going Clear met the eligibility criteria for an Oscar nomination.]
I am sorry, that has interfered... I understand this question. Let's discuss.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is compelled to leave. I will return - I will necessarily express the opinion.
I think, that you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
I consider, that you commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
Useful idea