Saul has unintelligible speech that interferes with communication. saul has a - dare once
JJK: For a good year I have been observing a dangerous esoteric trend. Thereby the correct assignments are missing and most people do not know at all, when somebody unloads negative energy and when somebody only reports from the negative, without wanting to put this garbage around somebody. This esoteric trend clearly goes to focus only on the positive, on the luminous, then everything will be fine. For me this is a dangerous development, because it simply fades out the whole life on this 3D level. After all, this is the reality in which we still move — or still do! Above all, I see that the people who no longer want to see the negative have the biggest problems when they themselves are caught up in negative events. saul has unintelligible speech that interferes with communication. saul has aSaul has unintelligible speech that interferes with communication. saul has a Video
Better Call Saul - Network Speech [S01E01]No hatemongering We will remove any post or comment that argues that an entire religion or cultural group commits actions or holds beliefs that would cause reasonable people to consider violence justified against the group.
Be Civil All Posts and comments must not attack individuals or groups. We will remove posts and comments that show disdain or scorn towards individuals or groups. While we understand that things can get heated, it is better for the quality of debate for people to combat arguments and not the persons making them.
Navigation menu
Thesis Statement and Argument All Posts must include a thesis statement as either the title or as the first sentence in the post. All posts must contain an argument supporting that thesis.
An argument is not just a claim. This rule also means you cannot just post links to blogs or videos or articles—you must argue for your position in your own words. The spirit commumication. this rule also applies to comments: we will remove comments that contain mere claims without argumentation.
Welcome to Reddit,
Substantial Top-Level Comments All top-level comments must substantially engage with the position articulated in the OP. Substantially engaging includes 1 attempt to refute the core argument being made; or 2 significantly expand upon the post; 3 or illuminate the position in the squl.
We will remove low-effort top-level comments. Comments that purely commentate on the post e. We expect all users to assign their flairs honestly to avoid comment removal. We encourage posters to appropriately address their submissions, thus identifying their target audience. All users are free to respond continue reading top-level comments. We want to group all the feedback into one weekly thread.
It is easier for us to act on.
The Nature of the Proceedings.
Top-level comments in Pilate Program threads without appropriate flair will be removed by automoderator. Theists: Your flair must reflect your religion. Atheists: AM does not recognize "agnostic" as a form of atheism, but will recognize "Agnostic atheist". Please contact the moderation team via modmail if you encounter any uas with the flair system.
What I would believe about morality if I was an atheist self.
Lately on this sub, at least in the comments, I've seen and participated in a lot of discussion in this thread on the subject of morality. It got me thinking about how secularism can provide someone with foundation for objective morality. I'll admit, the answers I've gotten have been extremely underwhelming, so I wanted to reach out in a post and get everyone's thoughts. I tried to think through the concept of morality from an atheist standpoint, trying to follow the line of reasoning to it's logical conclusion.]
Bravo, the excellent answer.
Here and so too happens:)
Something any more on that theme has incurred me.
In it something is also idea excellent, I support.
Willingly I accept.