What was the original goal of the constitutional convention - are
Further information: History of the United States — During the American Revolution , the thirteen American states replaced their colonial governments with republican constitutions based on the principle of separation of powers , organizing government into legislative , executive and judicial branches. These revolutionary constitutions endorsed legislative supremacy by placing most power in the legislature—since it was viewed as most representative of the people—including power traditionally considered as belonging to the executive and judicial branches. State governors lacked significant authority, and state courts and judges were under the control of the legislative branch. This alliance, the United States , was to be governed according to the Articles of Confederation , which was more of a treaty between independent countries than a national constitution. The Confederation was governed by the Congress of the Confederation , a unicameral legislature whose members were chosen by the state legislatures and in which each state cast a single vote. It could not levy taxes or tariffs, and it could only request money from the states, with no power to force delinquent states to pay. what was the original goal of the constitutional convention
The corrosive effect of misinformation. The rise of domestic terrorism. Foreign interference in elections.
Efforts to subvert the peaceful transition of power. And making matters worse on all of these issues is a fundamental truth: The two political parties see the other as an enemy. It is an outlook that makes compromise impossible and encourages elected officials to violate norms in pursuit of an agenda or an electoral victory. It turns debates over changing voting laws into existential showdowns.
And it undermines the willingness of the loser to accept defeat — an essential requirement of a democracy. It is not a term usually used in discussions about American politics. It is better known in the context of religious sectarianism — like the hostility between Sunnis and Shia in Iraq. Yet a growing number of eminent political scientists contend that political sectarianism is on the rise in America.
Navigation menu
Most of all, it re-centers the threat to American democracy on the dangers of a hostile and divided citizenry. In recent years, many analysts and commentators conventioj told a now-familiar story of how democracies die at the hands of authoritarianism: A demagogic populist exploits dissatisfaction with the prevailing liberal order, wins power through legitimate means, and usurps more info power to cement his or her own rule. Story continues Sectarianism, in turn, instantly evokes an additional set of very different cautionary tales: Ireland, the Middle East and South Asia, regions where religious sectarianism led to dysfunctional government, violence, insurgency, civil war and even disunion or partition.
.png "what was the original goal of the constitutional convention")
These are not always stories of authoritarian takeover, though sectarianism can yield that outcome as well. As often, it is the story of a minority that cannot accept being ruled by its enemy.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Whether religious or political, sectarianism is about two hostile identity groups who not only clash over policy and ideology, but see the other side as alien and immoral. It is the antagonistic feelings between the groups, more than differences over ideas, that drive sectarian conflict. Any casual observer of American politics would agree that there is plenty of hostility between Democrats and Republicans. Many do not just disagree, they dislike each other.
They hold discriminatory attitudes in job hiring as they do on the Implicit Association Test. They tell pollsters they would not want their https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/japan-s-impact-on-japan/functionalism-macro-or-micro.php to marry an opposing partisan. A majority of Americans said that other Americans were the greatest threat to America. On one level, partisan animosity just reflects the persistent differences between the two parties over policy issues.]
Willingly I accept. The question is interesting, I too will take part in discussion.
You are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.