2 Replies to “Descartes”
Descartes proof of gods existence 3 days ago. Whatever our point of view may be on the existence of one or more gods, and whether or not they actually exist, there is, or should be, no deny that gods are magical beings, AKA, cosmic wizards or sorcerers, who are able to manipulate time and space, tell the future, and have many other supernatural powers in their arsenal. Therefore, we can say that the existence of magic is imperative to the existence of gods, if if one believes in one or more gods, one necessarily believes in the existence of magic.
Hence why, if we wish to determine whether divine beings exist, we first of all must determine if there is such a thing as magic.
What is magic, you may ask? It is not in the possession of modern day "magicians", AKA, sensory artists who entertain people by performing visual tricks. Magic is simply the ability to manipulate or alter existence using one or more supernatural powers. Teleportation, time travel, omnipresence and so on -- gods, whether created by mankind or are beings that actually exist, must possess magical powers in order to exist, or otherwise they would not be the all-powerful entities that they actually are. I can tell or that Descartes proof of gods existence myself do not believe in magic; I believe in rationality, evidence, click here realism.
Since I have never myself encountered any supernatural entities or have witnessed any of their powers, I've yet to believe in the legitimate existence of magic. Rather, I am descartes proof of gods existence inclined to the idea that exiistence concept of magic was created in order to cover up for the ignorance of our ancient ancestors. Of course, the polytheistic religions of the far past are no longer dominant in our world, and instead we have, mostly, the Abrahamic religions, who promote the idea of the most ultimate god ever imaginable -- Yahweh, or simply God in English. Who is God? Because of such ultimate responsibility, logic dictates that it would take an immense amount of evidence to prove that Yahweh created the stars, the sky, descartes proof of gods existence material, every organic being and so on. This sheer amount of responsibility that takes to prove so much things as created by said entity is one of the reasons why I am, personally at least, still remain an atheist; I don't only not believe in the concept of magic as something that exists like anything else, but there is so much to prove that was created by the Abrahamic God, that Continue reading find it immensely difficult to believe in them.
This brings us to ethical in hr management question -- does magic exist? Remember, if we are to find the idea of one or more gods a descartws idea, we need to also find magic as just that -- an idea that is just as plausible as anything else that we find plausible. There will be, of course, people who will tell you that supernaturality exists; that there are or were certain creatures such as goblins, giants and ghosts that were recorded in human history, but let us not forget that our perception can deceive us as it can help us find the truth. Hallucinations, for example, are priof prime way our mind deludes us into believing there is something in our sight or senses that isn't actually there; It is an experience that can be realized by taking psychadelic drugs or by suffering from starvation.
Is proof for the existence of God necessary
Thus, should we trust a starved or a drugged-infused man or people such as scientists and philosophers? Of course, every one should have their story told, descartes proof of gods existence not every story is necessarily correct even if one strongly believes it is.
As I learned more and more about logic, I eventually realized that we humans are not purely logical beings, and are prone to constant mistakes in our estimations. Perhaps most of us know that the law should not be broken, but what are the odds the "average" person will know when they are making a logical fallacy such as ad-hominem or ad-populum? Logic, therefore, is to be learned, like any other field source knowledge. If we talk about gods and logical fallacies, perhaps the biggest logical fallacy when it comes to gods is the Ad-Infinitum fallacy. The problem is, even when such a predecessor to a cosmic creator is found, let us not forget that even that predecessor themselves need another predecessor -- and the list goes on, infinitely.]
You were not mistaken, all is true
I am final, I am sorry, but it at all does not approach me. Who else, what can prompt?
What magnificent words