There's no such thing as money laundering, it's a recently engineered legal construct that was hoping to help reduce actual crime the proceeds to launder. It totally failed.
Navigation menu
Prosecute the actual crime be it illegal drug distribution, illegal weapons dealing etc and do old-school police work infiltrating such networks, or even work on the tax evasion angle if needed When I look at the cryptocurrency economy vs a regulated economy, it's almost night and day in terms of criminal activity. The crypto world is rife with scams, schemes, extortion, fraud, etc. I also think this is an extremely dangerous thing to be wrong about. Look at how international war is waged these days: it's mexiccan economic. Consider the carnage that defined human existence italian mafia vs mexican cartel WWII[1]. I would argue that a big part of the reason all of our lives are so violence-free now is that nation-states fight over abstractions for power rather than physical power.
About this entry
Unfortunately, I believe this idea has really taken hold lately because owners of crypto are incentivized to believe it. It's pretty hard to convince someone of the dangers of something they're benefiting from financially. I don't think this is an exception. On the other hand, not all governments regulate their monetary systems well on behalf of their citizens, often inflating the money supply and devaluing their currency.
Essay On Bandidos
That carnage would have still existed today if not for WMDs. There just isn't much you can do when countries can just nuke each other. There arent any crime dangers for individual investors. Not more than with cash that is reply. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make here since the article references cryptocurrency once.
And you do know that there are regulated italian mafia vs mexican cartel exchanges, right? I believe it is still the primary mean which at least Russia criminals use. Baltics, Cyprus, much of South-East Europe, even Germany are places where semi-morbid micro banks are sold in weeks for symbolic amounts of money. The majority of the cost is an invisible tax on consumers and shareholders. Click here still a crime though right? You can't launder money for a criminal and say you did nothing wrong.
It's worse than that. You can't engage in financial transactions with another person without probing into the details italian mafia vs mexican cartel their life and reporting everything upstream to the stateor you're a criminal too. The Stasi worked this way. What you do is to create a process for KYC where you check against lists of threats like known terrorists or sanctioned persons, companies and governments. For example you check if your client lives in Crimea or Cuba, if so the dealings with them need to be limited in accordance of the jurisdiction trade in.
You also need to look out for suspicious transactions and block or maybe report those, for example if a local barbershop business is moving a lot of gold, you are supposed to catch that. There are a lot of companies and startups in the area who make tools to streamline this process. Source: I know people in the business.
I'm sorry to disappoint you but the governmental organisations don't have the thigh grip on citizens that Facebook or Google have on their users.]
Willingly I accept. The theme is interesting, I will take part in discussion. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is and it is good idea. It is ready to support you.
What words... super, a brilliant phrase