semantic differential scale examples.
The purpose. The article presents the results of study, the aim of which was to identify semantic space to the concept «food» among people with orthorexia nervosa.
Introduction
The term «orthorexia» is characterized by an obsessive desire for «healthy and proper eating», which leads to significant restrictions in semantic differential scale examples choice of food, that affect other areas of life and may lead to social isolation. The methods of verbal semantic differential and Intuitive Eating Scale-2 were used in the study. The basic coordinates of the semantic space were the statistical series of measured quantities that characterize interaction of respondents with food: tactile attractiveness, orderliness of nutrition, evaluation of the usefulness and emotional content of food. The sample covered subjects, men and women aged 18 to 68 years 77 males and females. The average age was 30;64 years, the standard deviation of 11; The semantic space of food perception by respondents with orthorexia is characterized by the predominance of the semantic differential scale examples criteria: perceptual attractiveness, order, usefulness and emotional attribution.
The criterion of perceptual attractiveness is the least important for people with orthorexia, nevertheless they react to food quite emotionally.
Semmantic semantics of such properties of food as «tasty», «quality», «usefulness», «beauty», «naturalness» and «fatness» directly correlate with indicators: intuitive eating; unconditional permission to eat; tendency to eat for physical rather than emotional reasons; reliance on hunger and satiety cues, body-food choice congruence. As a result of the analysis, the semantic space of food perception by https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/african-slaves-during-the-nineteenth-century/isth-toronto.php with orthorexia is outlined.
Connected groups hackerrank solution
The hypothesis of the relationship between the semantics of food properties and the levels of food intuition of the subject is fully verified. Amrullah, L. Indonesian staple food: semantic differential scale examples study of semantic prototype. Litera, 17 2. Anisimova, E. O vzaimodejstvii gastronomicheskogo i religioznogo diskursov kulturologicheskij i lingvisticheskij aspekty [On the interaction of gastronomic and religious discourses cultural and linguistic aspects ]. Vestnik MGLU. Gumanitarnye nauki — Journal of Minsk state university.
Navigation menu
Series humanitarian sciences, 231—44 [in Russian]. Artemeva, E. Osnovy psihologii subektivnoj dicferential [Fundamentals of the Psychology of Subjective Semantics] 2nd. Moscow: LKI [in Russian]. Barratt, D. Catania: Universita Degli Studi. Borgida, A. Bosi, A. Prevalence of Orthorexia Nervosa in resident medical doctors in the faculty of medicine.
Appetite, 49 3— Bratman, S. Orthorexia vs. Derzhavetska, I. Hliutonichnyi dyskurs: leksykohrafichnyi aspekt [Glutonic discourse: lexicographic aspect].
Diederich, C. Sensory Adjectives in the Discourse of Food. A frame-semantic approach to language and perception. Donini, L.]
Instead of criticising write the variants.
What necessary phrase... super, remarkable idea
I suggest you to visit a site on which there are many articles on a theme interesting you.
It is remarkable, very amusing idea
Magnificent idea and it is duly