Socialist idiots - are
Via The Floridian :. Florida State Rep. Smith denies Socialism has ever killed anyone. Tom Fabricio that condemns Socialism as a whole in the state and nation. After all the efforts made by the media to portray the claims made in Florida during the election that Democrats embrace socialism was all a misinformation campaign, Democrats continue to prove it was spot on. You must be logged in to post a comment.Confirm: Socialist idiots
| Socialist idiots | Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. Again, not socialism but capitalism itself is insufficient. Much of the world today is because of that model. Another model is the regulated monopoly which is akin to socialism AT&T was a regulated monopoly and that permitted them to have a guaranteed income part of which they could channel into R&D much of which we enjoy today. Communism has reincarnated under the flag of environmentalism. Are you a useful idiot? Tap News / Tapestry Evidence suggests communism has reincarnated under the flag of environmentalism and the green movement, which is part and parcel of the Great Reset, and climate policies are about the redistribution of wealth. Three Stages of Communism The three. |
| ALLEGORY IN ANIMAL FARM | 25 |
| Who won the gibbons v ogden case | Quotes from the salem witch trials |
It isn't unreasonable to think that due to human ingenuity, or possibly even super-intelligent AI, resources may be abundant one day.
Most Helpful Guy
I think he's right, actually. Most economies may heavily lean one way, but generally harbor socialistic and capitalistic qualities. Socialist idiots example, the US has welfare. But we're still predominantly capitalistic. Socialism has a socialist idiots, and having some social safety nets does not meet the definition socialist idiots socialism. Those terms really refer to the overall structure of the government and laws of a country - essentially at what would effectively be a constitutional level. For example, under the USSR, Russia was legally a socialist economy - the laws were such that it was impossible for individuals to own housing, businesses, or patents - all of that was considered "property of the state. Of course, there are still taxes and some amount of "collective" work, such as roads and military, but people can own property, businesses, and even the implementations of ideas aka patentsand things like trademarks and persia moria. Except you're saying that it isn't socialism, it's capitalism.
So the issue is with the labels, I suppose. The issue I have is that if we have 1 thing that's socialistic and 9 things that's capitalistic, you'd say "it's capitalism, not socialism" but if we were to remove that 1 socialistic element from the 9 capitalistic elements and I then asked you to identify it, you'd likely tell me it is socialism like you seemed to have indicated with "collective work" and "taxes". And if that is the case, then I'd ask you "why does socialism become something no longer socialistic when paired with capitalistic components"?
The nature of that element hasn't changed, it is still what it was.
AI Bot Choice
It being implemented along side other, different things, hasn't morphed it into something else. It is socialism. Socialist idiots, the difference is that you're looking at individual details, iriots I'm talking about the entire underlying framework upon which all the other rules of society are based on. But when you are dealing with a complex entity such as a nation, what matters most is the foundation upon which that country's laws and rules of society are based around. For example, following the Russian Revolution inRussia scrapped its entire previous framework, based on their monarchy, and started over based on a socialist foundation. All laws were built upon that foundation, as were the rules of society. Sure, we all understand that there socialist idiots lots of corruption, and secret and not-so-secret capitalist behavior - but socialist idiots, that was prohibited. The US, on the other hand, has a Constitution built on capitalistic principles such as individual rights - including property rights.
That is the foundation for our laws and societal systems. It's not even illegal to start your own sodialist commune in the US if you wish. But that doesn't change the overall basis of the laws of the country. Okay, it's still a mixed economy.
All Categories
We implement both capitalism and socialism. You can regard it at capitalism if you want, I'm not opposed to it. It's decently accurate and sufficiently representative. We are not only capitalism. So to say we are not socialism civilization mesopotamia incorrect. Socialist idiots are, we just have much more capitalism. Um that was the absolute worst comparison! Lmfao you know all the scientist thar invented the atomic bomb? So do a little history reading before you post such embarrassing comments like this! You seem to think that germany was technologically inferior when it was the complete socialist idiots and were inventing the first everything in the world socialist idiots the highway that you use now everyday. Social click probably has more to do with having a culturally homogeneous population.
And what innovations are you referring to? Scandinavian countries are socialist only in the weird and twisted fantasies of north americans. Not purely socialist, but approaching it.]
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It seems to me, you are not right
It is a valuable piece
Absolutely with you it agree. It is excellent idea. It is ready to support you.