Sui generis durkheim - consider, that
Gerschenkron , footnote 24 calls him "a Balto-Russian," while Barberis 69 says he "descended from Swedish nobility, held important Russian judicial posts, was governor of Kurland for 17 years and ultimately became a senator of the Russian Empire. Lilienfeld's research leaned towards social philosophy in general, and to speculations about the organic theory of society in particular Worms : , the first outlines of which he began to sketch, in Russian, in his Elements of political economy of and his Mysli of , and to develop more fully in German as his Gedanken of — Lilienfeld : ; Lilienfeld b : xiii—xiv. An anonymous reviewer in Mind noted that the first three volumes start with the conception of Society as a real organism, and attempt to work out this point of view upon the methods proper to the Natural Sciences. The treatise commences with a demonstration that Society consists of individuals in the same manner as the physical organism is made up of cells , and that the one is real in the same sense as the other. With this idea the author seeks to exhibit a thorough-going identity between the laws of Nature as they exist in the case of its highest development, Society, and in its lower stages, including the individual human being The first three parts are worked out with great minuteness, the connecting thread being the conception of a real analogy between the individual and the social group as the essential foundation of the Social Science of the future Anonymous : Lilienfeld's fourth volume dealt with "the establishment and elucidation of the Laws of Development of the Social Organism from the physiological point of view" Anonymous : sui generis durkheim
Laughs AA Could you tell me a little about the subfield of Christian Origins for our listeners who are less familiar? WB Yeah, well, the subfield is made up of more subfields. So obviously, that requires very generi skills. There are thousands and thousands of manuscripts of the whole or part of the New Testament. One has to be familiar with that, learn the languages, and make judgments about textual variants and sui generis durkheim on. Those are all references to the variants in the main suu as printed on the page. So textual criticism, source criticism, many of the—in fact, all of the New Testament texts, in their writings refer to or quote or allude to other texts, usually texts from the Hebrew Bible and the Greek form, the Septuagint.
Or sometimes they allude to other Greek texts. And then from sui generis durkheim s and 50s on, under the influence of the Form-critical school —for which, in the New Testament, Rudolf Bultmann is the main guy—Form-criticism became in vogue.
And it includes the study of the genres of the texts, and the little sub-genres, little forms, little stories, little sayings complexes, and so on, that Bultmann thought were the fundamental building blocks of the Gospels themselves. So, there are all kinds of methods. I took a methods course when I was in durkhei school.
Menú de navegació
And we went through all of these methods one by one, from text criticism to redaction criticism, to finally the question of interpretation. In reference to my comments earlier, the field is heterogeneous.
It employs all sui generis durkheim of protective strategies to insulate and isolate the text so that mainstream scholarship really tends to paraphrase and take over the terms and the ideologies and the viewpoints of the texts themselves. Or, as Jonathan Smith would say, mainstream New Testament scholarship is really an affair of native exegesis and an affair of the data with large. Which mainstream New Testament scholarship is inward looking towards the text. What does it say to us?
Navigation menu
What does the Bible have to say about gender? WB … from Claremont, retired now. Why is that I wonder? Why is the proximate other that is religion so disregarded? And if so, what are those questions? WB Yes, there are. In other words, we should read these texts like we read any text. These are religious texts.
About this episode
What interests do they represent? What arguments are they making? And if they should be successful in their arguments, who would benefit and who would lose?]
I confirm. It was and with me. We can communicate on this theme.
It seems to me, you are not right
Prompt, whom I can ask?