The reference list has been expanded to include all major viewpoints and influential articles.
Navigation menu
If check this out find something important missing, please let me know. A meta-psychological perspective on the decade of replication failures in social psychology. Advance online publication. I examine various explanations for this low replication rate and found most of them lacking in empirical support. I then provide evidence that the use of questionable research practices accounts for this result. I argue that quantifying replicability can provide an incentive to use good research practices and to invest more resources in studies that produce replicable results. The replication crisis in social psychology provides important lessons for other disciplines the facial-feedback hypothesis tells us that psychology that have avoided to take a closer look at their research practices.
Either they had to believe in anomalous effects or they had to believe that psychology was an anomalous science. It is now clear that Bem used questionable practices to produce false evidence for his outlandish claims Francis, ; Schim- mack,b, Moreover, it has become apparent that these practices were the norm and that many other findings in social psychology cannot be replicated. This realisation has led to initiatives to change research practices that produce more credible and replicable results. The speed and the extent of these changes has been revolutionary. Akin to the cognitive revolution in the s and the affective revolution in the s, the s have witnessed a method revolution.
Conclusion
Two new journals were created that focus on methodological problems and improvements of research the facial-feedback hypothesis tells us that Meta-Psychology and Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. In my review of the method revolution, I focus on replication the facial-feedback hypothesis tells us that in experimental social psychology and the different explanations for these failures. I argue that the use of questionable research practices accounts for many replication failures, and I examine how social psychologists have responded to evidence that questionable research practices QRPs undermine the trustworthiness of social psychological results. Other disciplines may learn from these lessons and may need to reform their research practices in source coming decade.
Replication Crisis Arguably, the most important development in psychology has been the publication of replication failures. When Bem published his abnormal results supporting paranormal phenomena, researchers quickly failed to replicate these sensational results. However, they had a hard time publishing these results. This attempt to suppress negative evidence failed for two reasons. Over the past decade, new article formats have evolved that make it easier to publish results that fail to confirm theoretical predictions such as registered reports Chambers, and registered replication reports Association for Psychological Science, Registered reports are articles that are accepted for publication before the results are known, thus avoiding the problem of publishing only confirmatory findings.
Registered replication reports are registered reports that aim to replicate an original study in a high-powered study with many laboratories.]
In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it.
I think, that you are mistaken. Let's discuss.
Bravo, seems magnificent idea to me is
In my opinion you are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.