What were the reasons for imperialism Video
Causes of Imperialism what were the reasons for imperialismDuring the Cold War, the United States and allied colonial Western powers directly waged several wars against national liberation movements or regimes, along with more limited military interventions and wars by proxy.
Navigation menu
In most of these what were the reasons for imperialism, Western powers confronted a local adversary supported by a large popular base. Standing against the imperialist intervention and in support of those whom it targeted seemed the obvious choice for progressives—the only discussion was whether the support ought to be critical or unreserved.
The whta of exclusively Western imperialist wars waged against popularly based movements in the Global South started to change, however, with the first such war waged by the USSR since the war in Afghanistan — A few figures, who until then belonged to the anti-imperialist left, shifted on this occasion to supporting the US-led war.
But the vast majority of anti-imperialists opposed it, even though it was waged with a UN mandate approved by Moscow. Most were no fans of Saddam Hussein either: They denounced him as a brutal dictator while opposing the US-led imperialist war against his country.
A further complication soon emerged. This led to a massive wave of Kurdish refugees crossing the border into Turkey. To stop this and allow the refugees to return, Washington imposed a no-fly zone NFZ over northern Iraq. There was hardly any anti-imperialist campaign against this NFZ, since the only alternative would have been continued ruthless suppression of the Kurds.
Then came the invasion of Iraq in —the last US-led intervention that united all anti-imperialists on the terms of opposing it. To illustrate the complexity of the questions that progressive anti-imperialism faces today—a complexity that is unfathomable to the simplistic logic of neo-campism—let us consider two wars hhe arose out of the Arab Spring. When popular uprisings managed to get rid of the presidents of Tunisia and Egypt in earlythe whole spectrum of self-proclaimed anti-imperialists applauded in unison, since both countries had Western-friendly regimes. But when the revolutionary shock what were the reasons for imperialism reached Libya, as was inevitable for a fiat edict that shared borders with both Egypt and Tunisia, the neo-campists were far less enthusiastic.
True to type, Gadhafi bloodily repressed the protests. The likelihood of a massacre of massive proportion was very high.
Popular Posts
The League of Arab States supported this request. Most Western anti-imperialists condemned the UNSC resolution as reminiscent of those which had authorized the onslaught on Iraq in In so doing, they overlooked the fact that the Libyan case had actually more in common with the NFZ imposed over northern Iraq link with the general onslaught on Iraq under the pretext of liberating Kuwait.
Yet, in the absence of alternative means of preventing the impending massacre, wede NFZ could hardly be opposed in its initial phase—for the same reasons that had led Moscow and Beijing to abstain. NATO preferred to keep them dependent on its direct involvement in the hope that it could control them.]
You are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM.
I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.
At you inquisitive mind :)
What useful question
The authoritative point of view, cognitively..