Why was the battle of saratoga so important - there's nothing
There are circular barbettes on blocks on her deck, which would have been used for the battlecruiser's main battery Saratoga was the fifth US Navy ship named after the Battle of Saratoga , an important victory during the Revolutionary War. After the war the ship was extensively redesigned to incorporate improved boiler technology, anti-torpedo bulges , and a general increase in armor protection based on British wartime experiences. Saratoga had a standard displacement of 36, long tons 36, t , and 43, long tons 43, t at deep load. At that displacement, she had a metacentric height of 7. It was feet Its minimum height was 21 feet 6. why was the battle of saratoga so important.Why Battlecruisers Had No Chance in Hell of Replacing Battleships Key Point: The new class of warships were meant to be fast enough to go in and hit hard, but also able to move quickly out of harm's way. Instead, these warships were too thinly armored to take much of a punch when actually hit.
Navigation menu
This first appeared in and is being reposted due to reader interest. The words were classic British understatement, but 3, dead sailors were ample evidence that something was indeed wrong with the vessels that were neither battleships nor cruisers. Battlecruisers were meant to be a solution to a problem, not a problem themselves. The concept seemed logical enough. Battleships were heavily gunned and heavily armored, but too slow to hunt down smaller, faster warships such as cruisers. On the other hands, cruisers lacked the tne and protection of the battlewagons.
So why not combine the two into a battleship-sized vessel armed with the big, long-range guns of a battlewagon, but with the speed of a cruiser? They could use their speed and firepower to chase down lighter enemy warships and commerce raiders.
If they encountered enemy battleships, their superior speed would enable them to escape. Battlecruisers were supposed to be a kind of seagoing Muhammad Ali: they would float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.
National Interest
Compare the Royal Navy's Queen Elizabeth-class battleships and the Renown-class battlecruisers, which fought in both World Wars I and II; they were both armed with fifteen-inch guns, but the battleships article source a top speed of twenty-four knots, while the battlecruisers could zip along at thirty-one knots. However, there is no free lunch in warship design: You can have armor, firepower or speed, but not all three, and armor was the trait that was sacrificed.
The battleship HMS Warspite was protected by an armor belt between the deck and waterline that was up to thirteen inches thick. Meanwhile, the battlecruiser HMS Renown had a maximum of ipmortant six inches of armor.
The consequences became evident at Jutland when three of seven British battlecruisers blew up, the victims of direct hits from German battlecruisers. Another notorious example is HMS Hood, which also exploded after a fifteen-inch shell from the German battleship Tye apparently plunged through the thin deck armor and detonated the magazine. Not surprisingly, most battlecruisers never made it to old age.
What went wrong?]
Excuse for that I interfere … But this theme is very close to me. I can help with the answer.
You are not right. I am assured. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.