Platos crito summary - turns!
Socrates is wise man with a different perspective on life, which presents us with a mass of contradictions. Socrates is an expressive man, yet he never recorded any works. He is ignorant, but wrongfully convicted who is willing to fight his unjust execution. Behind these dilemmas is an opposition not often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic of philosophers, who is dedicated to his state. I believe that Socrates should be considered a martyr, and his actions during his trial in the Apology proves my point. I believe that Socrates already accepted his fate before his trial began. To begin, Socrates is an advocate for questioning and voicing critique upon a government because he believes this is how political insight is sought. platos crito summaryPlatos crito summary Video
Plato's CritoPhaedo The extant, primary sources about the history of the trial and execution of Socrates are: the Apology of Socrates to the Juryby Xenophon of Athens, a historian; and critoo tetralogy of Socratic dialogues — Euthyphrothe Socratic ApologyCritoand Phaedoby Plato, a philosopher who had been a student of Socrates.
Navigation menu
In The Indictment of Socrates BCthe sophist platos crito summary Polycrates — presents the prosecution speech by Anytuswhich condemned Socrates for his political and religious activities in Athens before the read more BC. In presenting such a prosecution, which addressed matters external to the specific charges of moral corruption and impiety levelled by the Athenian polis against Socrates, Anytus violated platos crito summary political amnesty specified in the agreement of pltos — BC[21] which granted pardon to a man cirto political and religious actions taken before or during the rule of the Thirty Tyrants"under which all further charges and official recriminations concerning the [reign of] terror were forbidden".
The formal accusation was the second element of the trial of Socrates, which the accuser, Meletusswore to be true, before the archon a state officer with mostly religious duties who considered the evidence and determined that there was an actionable case of "moral corruption of Athenian youth" and " impiety ", for which the philosopher must legally answer; the archon summoned Socrates for a trial by jury. Although neither Plato nor Xenophon of Athens identifies the number of jurors, a jury of men likely was the legal norm.
Having been found guilty of corruption and impiety, Socrates and the prosecutor suggested sentences for the punishment of his crimes against the city-state of Athens. After that failed suggestion, Socrates then offered to pay a fine of drachmae—one-fifth of his property—which largesse testified to his integrity and poverty as a philosopher.
Free Loss Prevention Manual Term Paper Sample
Crkto, a fine of 3, drachmae was agreed, proposed by Plato, CritoCritobulus, and Apollodorus, who guaranteed payment—nonetheless, the prosecutor of the trial of Socrates proposed the death penalty for the impious philosopher. In the end, the sentence of death was passed by a greater majority of the jury than that by which he had been convicted. In the event, friends, followers, and students encouraged Socrates to flee Athens, an action which the citizens expected; yet, on principle, Socrates refused to flout the law and escape his legal responsibility to Athens. Crito Therefore, faithful to his teaching of civic obedience to the law, the platos crito summary Socrates executed his death sentence and drank the hemlock, as condemned at trial.
Their actions were to facilitate the transition of the Athenian government from a democracy to an platos crito summary in service to Sparta.
The fact that Critias, leader of the Thirty Tyrants, had been platos crito summary pupil of Socrates was held against him. For some, the execution of the man whom Plato called "the wisest and most just of all men" demonstrated the defects of democracy and of popular rule, for others the Athenian actions were a justifiable defence of the recently re-established democracy.
Plato's Totalitarianism
Stone argued that Socrates wanted to be sentenced to death, to justify his philosophic opposition to the Athenian democracy of that time, and because, as a man, he saw that old age would be an unpleasant time for him. In the introduction to his play Socrates on TrialAndrew Irvine claimed that because of his loyalty to Athenian democracy, Socrates willingly accepted the guilty verdict voted by the jurors at his trial: "During a time of war, and great social and intellectual upheaval, Socrates felt compelled to express his views, openly, regardless of the consequences. As a result, he is remembered today, not only for his sharp wit and high ethical standards, but also for his loyalty to the view that, in a democracy, the best way for a platos crito summary to serve himself, his friends, and his city—even during times of war—is by being loyal to, and by speaking publicly about the truth.
Five judges voted guilty platos crito summary five judges voted not guilty.
Limiting themselves to the facts of the case against Socrates, the judges did not consider any sentence, but the judges who voted the philosopher guilty said that they would not have considered the death penalty for him.]
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Write to me in PM, we will talk.