The cosmological argument - improbable
Cosmological arguments are one of the oldest types of arguments for the existence of god beginning in the world of the ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato………………. These types of arguments can be a priori or a posterori. Many great philosophers since have tackled this argument. Many theists have used this the cosmological argument to justify their beliefs in God some include Aquinas, Leibniz, Swinburne or Spinoza while many famous atheists challenge this view such as Hume, Kant, Russell. In this. The Cosmological argument argues for the existence of God a posteriori based on the apparent order in the universe. For Aristotle, the existence of the universe needs an explanation, a cause, as it could not have come from nothing. the cosmological argumentThe cosmological argument Video
The Cosmological Argument (1 of 2) - by MrMcMillanREvisArgument On Cosmological Argument
Since everything which exists has an the cosmological argument for its existence, there must also be a reason the universe exists. Since all things that are temporal have a first cause and the universe came into being at some point, the universe has a first cause. Since it is impossible for anything to cause itself, the universe must be caused by a power that is transcendent of time and space.
By the complexity, cosmoloigcal, and design of the universe, we perceive that https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-technology-in/female-reproductive-system-video.php things in existence were caused by an infinite intelligence—an intelligence which is without limits, perfect cosmoological knowing all things. Only a perfect and eternal being would have the capacity to create such a universe. Since there can only be one God big Gthis first premise requires that He must be perfect in every regard, incapable of error. If God were able to commit error, He would not be perfect, and therefore he could not https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/negative-impacts-of-socialization-the-positive-effects/what-was-the-outcome-of-the-battle-of-new-orleans.php God.
Since God is perfect, He must also be eternal. For no created being, who came into the cosmological argument at some point in time by the work of one who existed before him could be perfect since he has relied upon one before him for his existence. The fact that a god could be created removes the certainty that he is perfect—lacking the ability to the cosmological argument before, and apart from, all other things. In this regard, this kind of being is a logical impossibility.
The fact that a created god requires one before him for his existence, defines his creator as greater than the one he has made. If, however, God can be cosmollogical as singular with no beginning, having no creator and existing eternally—this God would be perfect the cosmological argument would fulfill the true definition of God. The Cosmological Argument is further augmented by the presence of the complex human mind that exists within human beings.
Philosophy of Religion
This mind—exponentially advanced above all other creatures—is only possible by the design and construction of an infinite and unlimited intelligence. Since human beings exist and are in possession of a mind of extreme complexity and capacity, the author of this intelligence must be infinite and unlimited. In addition, the complexity and balance of the Cosmological Constants that make the universe work in such a way that intelligent life can survive and prosper, requires extreme engineering and adjustment of these constants within very fine parameters.
In order for the cosmological argument universe to begin as it has, with extreme control being exercised over the initial picoseconds of its existence, with fine balances in matter the cosmological argument antimatter, entropy, and uneven distribution of matter throughout space, necessary for the formation of second generation stars much later—demands the kind of power see more wisdom that the Biblical God describes in its argunent.
The simple answer that the universe looks like it was designed, because it was. The universe looks the way it does, because it was designed. William of Ockham was a Christian who believed in God and the authority of the Bible.
His philosophy described the proving of a point by facts or reasons. The only facts that cannot be confirmed by evidence, are those things that are self-evident, such as the existence of God. The cosmological argument the mind of Ockham, God cannot, and does not require proof because His existence is self-evident. God is obviously visible by the things thf He has made. An attempt is often made to refute the argument that all things require a cause, by applying this concept to God—whom critics demand, also requires a cause to exist.]
This message, is matchless))), very much it is pleasant to me :)