The danger of a single story analysis - And
Questionnaires were sent to , drivers and analysis was done on the 36, who responded. The questionnaire asked about driving habits, risk exposure, collisions over the past 24 months, socio-demographic information, and cell phone use. Questionnaires were supported with data from cell phone companies and crash records held by police. The study found that the overall relative risk RR of having a crash for cell phone users when compared to non-cell phone users averaged 1. When adjusted for distance driven per year and other crash risk exposures, RR was 1. They also found that increased cell phone use correlated with an increase in RR. When the same data were reanalyzed using a Bayesian approach, the calculated RR of 0. the danger of a single story analysis.Now, before delving into exactly how Adichie used these strategies to propel her argument, it must be noted what was happening in the world as she delivered her speech.
The audience scarcely needed Adichie to tell them that all over the world disagreements and misunderstandings have led to war. To further prove her point, Adichie describes another personal encounter with one of her students, who after reading her novel, assumed that all Nigerian men are physical abusers. By showing the audience just how ridiculous single-story perceptions can be, such as how the assumption that all Nigerian men are abusive is equal to assuming that all American teenagers are serial killers, Adichie makes her audience understand just how easy it is to participate in a single story and just how damaging the effect might be to an audience that does not immediately recognize the fallacy of that reductive point of view. Adichie does not only call upon https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/why-building-administrations-have-a-developing-business/sabbath-sign-of-the-covenant.php to prove her point.
Talking Points
Adichie exudes a similar, humbling tone at an earlier point link the speech when she analyzes exactly why her university roommate had so many pre-existing convictions regarding Africans. This prompts the necessity for a new way of thinking about such ethnic groups, such as her own multifaceted perspective which she is professing throughout her talk. Adichie uses not only pathos but also ethos to support her argument.
Adichie begins to establish this credibility with her audience, a credibility which drives the audience to trust her argument by telling of her experience when she wrote as a child. Adichie is essentially using some of her earliest memories as a writer to point out that she too was prone to adhere to a single narrative and thatshattering those single-story prejudices can only happen if access to other narratives is provided.
Adichie also further establishes her credibility by challenging the notion that all writers must come from troubled backgrounds to write meaningful literature.
Secondary Header Navigation
She admits that she herself did not have much of a troubled childhood at all dangee was quite happy, confessing only a few troubling events such as the death of her grandparents in refugee camps, of her cousin in a plane crash, and her own upbringing under a repressive military government. However, she insists that she chooses not to forget about all of the positive aspects of her childhood or to let these negative events define who she is This honesty and humility makes her seem more like an actual person who can be listened to and who gives correct, down-to-earth information, boosting her credibility with https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-technology-in/pirates-of-the-caribbean-on-stranger-tides-free-online-movie.php audience.
With more speakers like Adichie, who engage such inspiring ideas and such effective skills in persuasion, the world can be turned into a more inclusive and racially accepting place. Adichie, Chimamanda Ngozi.]
Many thanks for support how I can thank you?
Lost labour.
I think, what is it — a false way. And from it it is necessary to turn off.