Confession of an economic hitman Video
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins Book Summary - Review (AudioBook) confession of an economic hitmanBrowse more videos
Such sentiments are routine for liberals and hardly unknown among social democrats. Such sentiments are, to anyone who cares to pursue a study of history, quite ahistorical. Violence, force and coercion — exemplified in the widespread use of slave labor, imperialist conquests of peoples around the confessjon and ruthless extraction of natural resources — pervades the entire history of capitalism.
To follow up confession of an economic hitman my previous article discussing how U. Perkins, for those not familiar with his book, provides a first-hand account of how the U. That is no surprise to anyone paying attention, but the book became an improbable best-seller, meaning there must have been many eyes opened. That can only be a positive development. But even Effects of european exploration. Given the confsssion service he has provided in writing econmic book, and the physical danger that he put himself in to publish it he postponed writing it multiple times fearing possible consequencesleast of all do I want to imply criticism or raise any snarky accusations against Am.
My point here is that even a strong critic of U. Confession of an economic hitman all-encompassing pervasiveness of capitalist propaganda, and that the relentless dissemination of it across every conceivable media and institutional outlet, still leaves most people with a wistful idealization of some earlier, innocent capitalism not yet befouled by anti-social behavior and violence or by greed. Horrific, state-directed violence in massive doses enabled capitalism to slowly establish itselfthen methodically expand from its northwestern European beginnings.
English lords wanted to transform arable land into sheep meadows to take advantage of the demand for wool, and began razing peasant cottages to clear the land. For example, beginning with the Tudors, England created a series of stern measures to prevent peasants from drifting into vagrancy or falling back onto welfare systems. According to a statute, beggars over the age of fourteen were to be severely flogged and branded with a red-hot iron on the left ear unless someone was willing to take them into service for two years.
Repeat offenders over the age of eighteen were to be executed unless someone would take them into service.
Third offenses automatically resulted in execution. As industrial resistance gathered steam, the British government employed 12, troops to repress craft workers, artisans, factory workers and small farmers who were resisting the introduction confession of an economic hitman machinery by capitalists, seeing these machines as threats to their freedom and dignity. Slavery critical to capitalist accumulation Nor can the role of slavery in bootstrapping the rise of capitalism be ignored. The slave trade, until the end of the seventeenth century, was conducted by government monopolies. Britain and other European powers earned far more from the plantations of their Caribbean colonies than from North American possessions; much Caribbean produce could not be grown in Europe, while North American colonies tended to produce what Europe could already provide for itself. Britain profited enormously from the triangular trade, both in the slave trade itself and the surpluses generated from plantation crops produced with slave labor.
Proceeds from the slave trade were large enough to lift the prosperity of the British economy as a whole, provide the investment funds to build the infrastructure necessary to support industry and the scale of trade resulting from a growing industrial economy, and ease credit problems.
Promotions
And no other thing have they done for forty years until this day, and still today see fit to do, but dismember, slay, perturb, afflict, torment, and destroy the Indians by all manner of cruelty — new and divers and most singular manners such as never before seen or read of heard of — some few of which shall be recounted below, and they do this to such a confession of an economic hitman that on the Island of Hispaniola, of the above three million souls that we once saw, today there be no more than two hundred of those native people remaining.
The British replaced the Spanish, using more modern financial means to exploit the region. Argentina flung its ports wide open to trade under British influence, flooding itself with a deluge of European goods sufficient to strangle nascent local production; when Argentina later attempted to escape dependency by imposing trade barriers in order to build up its own industry, British and French warships forced the country open again. We are concentrating on Britain for the moment because it was the leading capitalist power at this time. British warships were sent to China to force the Chinese to import opium, a drug confession of an economic hitman was illegal back home. Britain controlled India and oversaw one million Indian opium farmers. They were aware of its poisonous effects on the Chinese people, but few of them ever mentioned the drug in the thousands of pages of letters and documents they sent back to America.
After a refusal, Chinese authorities destroyed all the opium they could find. In response, British warships were sent to bombard coastal cities until China agreed to the one-sided Treaty of Nanking, in which it was forced to pay Britain an indemnity of millions, to cede Hong Kong and to open five ports to trade, where foreigners were not subject to Chinese law or authorities. When further demands were refused, the British, French and U. Far from it. The human toll, however, is still higher because, simultaneous with those who were successfully kidnapped, millions more can zolor question killed or maimed, and thus not shipped across the Atlantic.]
In my opinion you are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
Now all became clear to me, I thank for the help in this question.
I confirm. And I have faced it. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.