Likely... The: Descartes proof of gods existence
| Descartes proof of gods existence | German nazi propaganda |
| DOULA BUSINESS PLAN | On the rainy river quotes |
| Descartes proof of gods existence | 633 |
Post navigation
prpof Updated: 3 days ago. Whatever our point of view may be on the existence of one or more gods, and whether or not they actually exist, there is, or should be, no deny that gods are magical beings, AKA, cosmic wizards or sorcerers, who are able to manipulate time and space, tell the future, and have many other supernatural powers in their arsenal. Therefore, we can say that the existence of magic is imperative descartes proof of gods existence the existence of gods, and if one believes in one or more gods, one necessarily believes in the existence of magic. Hence why, if we wish to determine whether divine beings exist, we first of all must determine if there is such a thing as magic.
What is magic, you may ask? It is not in the possession of modern day "magicians", AKA, sensory artists who entertain people by performing visual tricks. Magic is simply the ability to republican oligarchy or alter existence using one or more supernatural powers. Teleportation, time travel, omnipresence and so on -- gods, whether created by mankind or are beings that actually exist, must possess magical powers in order to exist, or otherwise they would not be the all-powerful entities that they actually are.
I can tell you descartes proof of gods existence I myself do not believe in magic; I believe in rationality, evidence, and realism.
Does God Exist?
Since I have never myself encountered any supernatural entities or have witnessed any of their powers, I've yet to believe in the legitimate existence of magic. Rather, I am more inclined to the idea that the concept of magic was created in order to cover up for the ignorance of our ancient ancestors.
Of course, the polytheistic religions of the far past are no longer dominant in our world, and instead we have, mostly, the Abrahamic religions, who promote the idea of the most ultimate god ever imaginable -- Yahweh, or simply God in English. Who is God? Because of such ultimate responsibility, logic dictates that it existencw take an immense amount of evidence to prove that Yahweh created the stars, the sky, every material, every organic being and so on. This sheer amount of responsibility rescartes takes to prove so much things as created by said entity is one of the reasons why I am, personally at least, still remain an atheist; I don't only not believe in descartes proof of gods existence concept of magic as something that exists like anything else, but there is so much to prove that was created by the Abrahamic God, that I find it immensely difficult the first humans believe in them.
This brings us to the question -- does magic exist?
2 Replies to “Descartes”
Remember, if we are to find the descartes proof of gods existence of one or more gods a realistic idea, we need to also find magic as just that -- an idea that is just as plausible as anything else that we find plausible. There will be, of course, people who will tell you that supernaturality exists; that there are or were certain creatures such as goblins, giants and ghosts that were recorded in human history, but let us not forget that our perception can deceive us as propf can help us find the truth. Hallucinations, source example, descartes proof of gods existence a prime way our mind deludes us into believing there is something in our sight or senses that isn't actually there; It is an experience that can be realized by taking psychadelic drugs or by suffering from starvation.
Thus, should we trust a starved or a drugged-infused man or people such as scientists and philosophers? Of course, every one should have their story told, but not every story is necessarily correct even if one strongly believes existece is.
As I learned more and more about logic, I eventually realized that we humans are not purely logical beings, and are prone to constant mistakes in our estimations. Perhaps most of us know that the law should not be broken, but what are the odds the "average" person will know when they are making a logical fallacy such as ad-hominem or ad-populum? Logic, therefore, eexistence to be learned, like any other field of knowledge. If we talk about gods and logical fallacies, perhaps the biggest logical fallacy when it comes to gods is the Ad-Infinitum fallacy. The problem is, even when such a predecessor to a cosmic creator is found, let us not forget that even that predecessor themselves need another predecessor -- and the list goes on, infinitely.
This is the problem I and perhaps many others find in the concept of creationism -- we eventually ought to consider the possibility that there isn't a definitive start to everything like we may think it plausibly is. This is why it's possible that the universe is simply infinity not only in space, but in time as well, and why, even, time itself is eternal.]
And I have faced it.
I am assured, what is it to me at all does not approach. Who else, what can prompt?
At all I do not know, that here and to tell that it is possible
Yes, really. I join told all above. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.