Relational dialects - All
Social identity is complex and multifaceted. While census-like data has an important place in sociological research, everyone interacts with their social categorization uniquely. To bring this into focus in the field of linguistics, I conducted research on the relationship between regional dialects and gay identity. Using data from interviews that I conducted with two twenty-two-year-old gay men from southern New Hampshire, I followed in a line of research that focuses on the performative nature of social identity. I reached two particularly interesting findings. While the former is likely due to the association of gay-sounding speech with ideologies on proper speech and the second likely due to an idea that the participants would be safer expressing their gay identity in New York than they are in New Hampshire, both show that the expression of social identity is a complex, multi-layered phenomenon. Skip to main content. Read full article ». relational dialectsRelational dialects Video
Relational DialecticsLatest Posts
Relational dialectics is relational dialects interpersonal communication theory about close personal ties and relationships that highlights the tensions, struggles and interplay between contrary tendencies. Relationships are made in dialogue and they can be complicated and dialogue with similarities and differences are necessary. Relational communication theories allow for opposing views article source forces to come together in a reasonable way. Baxter and Barbara M. Montgomery exemplify relational dialects contradictory statements that arise from individuals experience dialectal tensions using common proverbs such as "opposites attract", but "birds of a feather flock together"; as dialectd as, "two's company; three's a crowd" but "the more the merrier".
The relational dialectic is an elaboration on Mikhail Bakhtin 's idea that life is an open monologue and humans experience collisions between opposing desires and needs within relational communications.
Navigation menu
Although Baxter's description of relational dialectics is thorough, it is not exact or all-inclusive since we all experience different tensions in different ways. Relational dialectics is the emotional and value-based version of the philosophical dialectic.
It is rooted in the dynamism of the yin and yang. Like the classic yin rialects yang, the balance of emotional values in a relationship is constantly in motion, and any value pushed to its extreme, contains the seed of its opposite. In the Western worldthe ideas of yin and yang link back to the Relational dialects philosopher Heraclituswho argued that the world was in constant flux like firewith creative and destructive forces on both sides of every process.
Mikhail Bakhtina Russian scholar most known for his work in dialogismapplied Marxist dialectic to literary and rhetorical theory and criticism. He illustrated the tensions that exists in dialevts deep structure of all human experience. Bakhtin conceived the human relational dialects as two forces analogous to the physical forces centripetal emotional forces tending towards unity and centrifugal emotional forces tending towards divergence.
Search form
Like the Yin and Yang, Bakhtin's forces have no ultimate resolution. Baxter took the deep structural analysis of Bakhtin and applied it to communication theory. She found a T-Bangha of axes where this dynamic tension operated.
For example, an individual can either like hot or cold weather. They may not like not a mix of weather conditions.]
The theme is interesting, I will take part in discussion. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.
In my opinion you commit an error. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
Well, and what further?
I can not participate now in discussion - it is very occupied. But I will be released - I will necessarily write that I think.