What is kotakuinaction - the
We believe that the current standards of ethics in the media has alienated the artists, developers, and creators, who perpetuate the things we love, enjoy, and enthusiastically build communities around. We have taken notice of various incidents involving conflicts of interest and agenda-pushing within media which we feel are damaging to the credibility of the medium and harm the community at large. We believe the current media is complicit in the proliferation of an ideology that squashes individuality, divides along political lines, and is stifling to the freedom of creativity that is the foundation of human expression. KotakuInAction is a community that condemns willful censorship, exclusion, harassment, or abuse. It is a community that organizes to hold the media accountable to the concept of artistic freedom by standing up for the artist, the developer, the writer, the filmmaker, and all who enjoy the freedom to create, explore, and expand. It is a community that allows the exchange of information, supports the ongoing discussion of media ethics, and protects the right of the individual to embrace their personal interests in entertainment and freedom. Kotaku in Action became the defacto one for Gamergate discussion Besides 8chan , along with talks about censorship, agendas, bias, and other issues in the gaming media and related topics. Therefore, even though Kotaku in Action is a good resource, the subscribers are discourage to buy reddit gold aka premium membership or allowing ads on the site. On July 13, , davidme set the subreddit on private and attempted to nuke KotakuInAction. Sometime in July 19, , david-me posted his his new plans for KotakuInAction.What is kotakuinaction Video
Let's talk about KotakuInAction \u0026 \ what is kotakuinaction
After it posted a screenshot from Postal 2 showing a tombstone for gaming journalism, VG which has long hated gamers and other trash sites freaked out and started accusing GOG of sympathizing with a movement responsible for Some verified checkmark on Twitter even accused GOG of voicing support for a 'terrorist movement'. GOG quickly removed the tweet and attacked Gamergate as an 'abusive movement'. Now an employee, a GOG representative on Reddit, has made a comment about the whole matter. Here is the response: Well shoot, why don't I explain. We didn't realize it was more than just the game's trademark crudeness, what is kotakuinaction many people read it as a show of support for a wave of hate and abuse associated with the date on the tombstone. What is kotakuinaction, we removed the tweet and clarified our intentions.
Navigation menu
On a personal note, I think that much of the "Don't apologize" comes from people who feel that this was indeed our intention but we just caved to pressure. I know there isn't much debating that, but from an insider's perspective — it honestly wasn't.
I will also point out that this is a poor employee of GOG, what is kotakuinaction his job and defending decisions he doesn't necessarily agree with. A couple of whag come to mind none of which are mine originally.
The date in question is August what is kotakuinaction, the date when the 'gamers are dead' articles were published. Yet wht is not called a 'wave of hate', but the uppity gamers who dared to object to being labeled 'obtuse shit-slingers', racists, misogynists, etc. Does GOG believe that its own partner TotalBiscuit, blessed be his name, was part of an 'abusive movement' because of his strong support for Gamergate and Gamergate concerns in late and early ? For that matter, if this is not a response to pressure, does it follow that GOG sincerely despises its own customers?
Should you desire to give feedback to GOG, here is where you'd be able to send it. Update: This is the non-response that people who complain are apparently receiving. No addressing of the substantive issue at all, just turtling down and saying that 'support' has no comment on the what is kotakuinaction and closing the ticket. This does not mean that it is pointless to say something, because they sure as what is kotakuinaction will be taking stock of how much pushback they get over their cowardly actions. Update 3: The PR representative in question appears on I gotta say, what gets me here hardest is stuff like "Oh, you guys took a stance but got bullied into apologizing".
I mean no — I'm sitting right here and it's not what happened, there was no stance, only a careless tweet. The outcry did make us aware of the implication. Now we know and we're better for it. Pathetic, so you do unironically hate your own customers?]
In it something is. Thanks for an explanation. I did not know it.