Religion makes me uncomfortable - you
Christ followers know what love appears and acts like. It forgives readily. It retains no file of wrongs. It trusts and perseveres. It says settle for each other, have compassion for each other, encourage and honor each other. And on and on like that. We learn it and we all know it in our head. Why then are we regularly stingy with this sort of loving? religion makes me uncomfortable
Reviews Rated 4 out of 5 by Juniper from What about the rest of the story? I didn't anticipate the approach to the topic as it is presented. I feel that while the discussion was informative and interesting, there was a huge religion makes me uncomfortable in the discussion. I understand Professor Principe was directing the discussion towards contrasting the strict religion makes me uncomfortable between theology and science with particular emphasis please click for source the role of the Catholic Church in the development of science as well as theology.
The history of the Catholic church should include the political as well as the theological contributions to the development of "Western Civilization. From the time when Constantine became a Christian, I believe every ambitious man in the Roman Empire jumped on that boat. Traditional Roman religion did not require commitment other than tradition.
So declaring loyalty to Roman architecture did not require abandonment of previously held conviction but did promise a seat on the gravy train. The evolution of the Roman Catholic Church as a political force was assured by the momentum of the power inherent in not only Constantine's position but by the influx of intelligent, bright and aggressive individuals who wanted to align themselves with the winning team. The Catholic Church undoubtedly has brilliant and spiritual voices who address topics of theology but the influence of those individuals who were in it for the power and the prestige brought a passion to the heart of the church's advancement.
To discuss the relationship of theology and science without including the highly political motives of very influential individuals whose greatest commitment was to the religion makes me uncomfortable of the church's power and control. Professor Principe does not address the political ambitions of the church and it's consequences to the world of science. I felt that he spent a lot of time in his lecture claiming that "Hey, theologians are serious and careful thinkers just like scientists are. But they always fall back on a premise God exists and has little to do with science. Scientists cannot prove the absence of God but their work is not hindered by that fact.
What Girls & Guys Said
Many never stop appreciating the wonder of our universe never ceases to fill us with wonder and joy. Date published: Rated 4 out of 5 by IowaHomer from Broad title for a tightly-defined course This course is, by the professors own definition, a review of the interaction of science and Christianity within Western Europe and Uncomfortwble America.
This course does not cover other non-Christian religion makes me uncomfortable nor does it cover non-western cultures. One advantage to his approach: he does not need to define "religion". So, in this regard, a better title would have been "A religion and science.
Religion makes me uncomfortable this course becomes is a history of the "religion and science are at war" thesis and why, in the professor's opinion, this is either a mis-reading of history or the entire history of the conflict is a misunderstanding between the two spheres of thought. If you were to boil down that history into what most people know in our culture, that history revolves around two people: Galileo and Darwin. In this regard, the professors spends two lectures on each and why the ideas that these men espouse became such lightening rods for our culture. Is this course either anti-Christian or anti-science? I believe it is neither.
Welcome to Reddit,
The professor does an admirable job of trying to show the limitations and strengths of each area, where religion makes me uncomfortable intersect, and where they diverge. I checked "yes" to the statement, "I would recommend this course to a friend" because I already have. That said, I makee this course a bit disappointed. While I am glad for the historical overview, the history ends in midth century. The professor seems to hope that science does not run over religion, making it unable to compete intellectually.
I think where the professor could have benefitted was to go into the philosophical arguments that the sides are currently using to either divide the proponents of each side or to bring them together. While his treatment of the Galileo affair is brilliant, those arguments are not being played out NOW. Helio-centrism is settled. What about cloning humans, repigion instance?
How does science approach it?]
I am sorry, it not absolutely approaches me. Perhaps there are still variants?