It's become quite clear over the past few years that the Republicans' platform these days is "punish those who disagree with us," or, in the shorter vernacular: "cry moar, libs. Cathy McMorris Rodgers.
The platform actually starts out making some amount of sense, but note that it will ignore all of that within a single page. The principles laid out are actually good ones -- if the plan actually followed them which it does not :. We will be mindful of small businesses and entrepreneurship: Any policy we pursue will balance these essential interests to preserve competition.
We will promote American tech leadership and innovation: We will continue to promote American global leadership while working to address issues here at home. What is the republican platform could build a good platform around those pointers.
Related storyboards
But, this is not that. On the very next page, it lists out its legislative "concepts" for Section reform, which quickly show how things go off the rails. Alternatively, define Big Tech companies as places of public accommodation and limit liability protections to content moderation processes that provide a measure of due process to users. So, uh, remember that whole thing about respecting free speech and source bringing back the fairness doctrine?
This legislative concept is literally bringing back the fairness doctrine. It's also unconstitutional as it attacks the 1st Amendment rights of companies not to be compelled to host speech they don't want to host. Perhaps even more incredible is that while the first legislative concept is https://digitales.com.au/blog/wp-content/custom/a-simple-barcoding-system-has-changed-inventory/roman-architecture-characteristics.php "moderate less," the second legislative concept is "moderate more"! Require Big Tech companies to implement and maintain reasonable moderation practices to address illegal drug sales; child exploitation, including child pornography and trafficking; targeted harassment or bullying of users under the age of 18; terrorism; counterfeit products and materials sales; and all other illegal content on their platforms.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Such what is the republican platform may be liable for content decisions related to content included above but may assert liability protections if they implement and maintain reasonable moderation practices. This shows how totally unprincipled and ignorant the Republicans are on this topic. It's kind of the standard response of those who don't even understand the basics of content moderation. The assumption is always that there's some perfect level of moderation -- less moderation of speech we like, and more moderation of speech we dislike.
But that assumes everyone agrees on which speech is liked and which speech is not.]
I congratulate, what excellent answer.